138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?
from New York, New York
bump
Ummmmm.....
Didn't the last swine flu prop pay off because we passed 500 U.S. cases? Maybe you have some other number in mind and typed in "500" by mistake.
As of 11AM today, the CDC has the U.S. total at 642.
Okay, I clicked on your W.H.O. link, and they list the U.S. has having just over 400 cases. Does the W.H.O. have a separate way of counting infected patients than the CDC, or is the CDC getting false positives? And if they are false positives, why did the first swine flu prop pay out?
Confusing.
How is this prop diffrent from the one that just delisted?
Do you mean 500 NEW cases? for a total of 1000?
I've been told that the 1918 outbreak was mild at first, in the spring, Disappeared during the summer, Then came back full-blast in August.
Todays flu looks like it might follow the same patern.
Perhaps this prop:
Will swine flu H1N1 return in Aug 2009 causing xxx new cases between Aug 1 and Aug 31, 2009?
That link says "The United States has reported 642 laboratory confirmed human cases" as of today so this prop has to be changed to more than 500
do you mean that the number of active cases does not drop below the 500 mark?..... just saying that if they don't die they have to get well and if they get well the number of cases should drop right?