138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?
Carrying the flag that props should not close on Jan 1st.
Does the announcement need to have independent verification?
Questions:
What if gene therapy for AIDS turns out to be a viable treatment, but not a cure? Obviously AIDS patients will see that as a success, but will we as prop gamblers?
What if a miracle drug comes out that cures AIDS, but is unrelated to gene therapy? Again, AIDS patients of the world will rejoice. But if a drug like that comes out, 3 years from now, and gene therapy treatment is abandoned due to costs and lack of need, are we going to ride a 6 year short? I'm not saying this is a bad thing, I just want to make sure this is what we are agreeing to.
I don't have a huge problem with this Jan. 1 prop, because it's 2018. As long as we don't stack up 5+ props on the same date, the occasional Jan. 1 is fine. But this is a 9 year prop, not a 10 year prop, right? Otherwise, the date should be 2019. Just checking.....
from Lexington, KY
I agree with Chef. If a cure came through that had nothing to do with Gene Therapy, would this be a short? It needs specifics.
Also, does a cure have to be 100% accurate? Say they were to test the cure on 1000 people and 999 were cured but the last one wasn't?
from Brooklyn, NY
I think it reads better like this: This proposition will pay off at POP$100 per share if by January 1, 2018 by 3 p.m. EST., a scientist announces that they’ve developed a gene-therapy AIDS cure.
Also do scientists "announce" cures, or do they announce various stages of testing/implementation?
I think the point in which it's considered a cure should be clarified (lab tests, human tests, or publicly available)
Also I may not be speaking for everyone here, but I do think that if you don't wanna keep up the 3-prop-per-week rate while you are on vacation, we will understand.
from New York, New York
Wow-- great points. These did need clarification. The new payout criteria is below. Also-- Traderboi, thanks! I'll keep doing the props but I may be slow on email responses (but I have everyone's emails and will get to them, I promise).
Thanks for your careful review of this prop!
t
This proposition will pay off at POP$100 per share if a scientist announces, by January 4, 2018 by 3 p.m. EST, that they’ve developed a gene-therapy AIDS cure (proven effective on at least 50% of human test subjects).
Notes: This prop will only pay short if a gene-therapy AIDS cure is not announced by its closeout date. If another (non- gene therapy) cure is announced before the closeout date, the prop will not short because of it.