Testing the first mouse designed to work on nearly any material, from shiny desks to shaggy rugs

Get It: Microsoft Explorer Mouse $100 Greg Neumaier

THE TECH
To calculate their position, most mice use a red LED or a laser to light up a surface, take thousands of pictures per second of the shadows cast by the surface’s microscopic bumps, and then analyze the differences between shots. But that doesn’t work if there are no bumps, as on glossy tables, or if a jagged surface, like carpet, traps narrow light beams between fibers. So Microsoft’s Explorer moves the camera sensor forward to capture the light reflected by any surface. In addition, the Explorer uses a blue LED, evened out with a diffuser. Shining wider than a laser beam and more uniformly than a red LED, it allows the camera to capture clearer, larger images, which should lead to better accuracy no matter what surface the mouse is on.

THE TEST
I swiped the Explorer across just about every flat object in my home, plus some that weren’t so flat, including a red cut-glass plate, a nubby crocheted blanket and my none-too-thrilled cat.

THE RESULTS
The Explorer did better than promised. It worked not only on plush rugs and angry pets, but also on clear glass, one of the two surfaces Microsoft says it can’t handle. (It even tracked sometimes on the other near-impossible surface, a mirror.)

12 Comments

i like it a lot.!

Hmmm, just an idea / comment / question....

Why try to build a "perfect" mouse when we could just build the "perfect" touch screen LCD that hopefully has no need for a mouse?

We could use the material that was featured yesterday for that LCD, hopefully, it should become sensitive enough to distinguish pressures or heat exerted in very small spaces for that "touch screen" LCD

@ Chipper

The problem with a touch screen is the same as computer interfaces you see in many futuristic movies (I'm thinking Minority Report off the top of my head). If you're using it for more than a few minutes it is really uncomfortable to hold your hand up as opposed to sliding it around on a desk.

Hi JRS ONE,

Then maybe one could just have a flexible LCD screen wherein it doesn't have to be oriented vertically with regards to the floor, for all we know an LCD screen could be invented that is flexible enough to be put in the lap of the person... so that should prevent strain on the hands of the person...

However, I agree, a mouse is more useful for conventional pc setups wherein the pc screen is in the "current" setup... which is some inches away from a person and is perpendicular to the person's vision.

Just that it takes so much to invent some peripheral that's supposed to work on any surface when some type of "way" would be better. Am not saying that the mouse would be obsolete someday, but it could be.... although am not sure about this.... coz I don't have a crystal ball... "winks"

DDTx2

from Caracas, Miranda

We need a interactive desktop surface with hands gesture recognition.

$100 is a lot for a mouse, no matter what it does.

How about a system that tracks the movement of your eyes to determine where your attention is focused onscreen, then add facial commands(blinking combinations such as a double or triple blink, or subvocalization commands using a system that tracks your lips).

@Chipper Smoltz: What you just described is more commonly known as a tablet. Wacom's very popular digitizers work by emitting and sensing electromagnetic fields, allowing for a lot of versatility in the actual device used to do the input. Other technologies include optical (ie: MS surface), capacitive (ie: the touchpad on most laptops), and resistive.

There are a number of problems with using these technologies on a large scale. Unless the device incorporates a display, it's not really possible to use it in a multitouch manner (since you can't easily see where a touch will be registered). Incorporating a display is fairly expensive for even slightly mobile installations, which is the primary market for mice (even desktop PCs are moved with some regularity in most households).
Trying to balance sensor accuracy, surface area, cost, and mobility is a big concern. I, too dream of a future of OLED displays with embedded touch sensitive capabilities being commonplace, but I fear that future is still a decade or more off.

They already sell gyro mice for less than $100 sold by Gyration. From my personal experiance these are much more comfortable than touchscreens, and can be used in the air by tilting, or can be used like standard optical mice.

DiGMEH

from Montreal, Quebec

I like the technology but the more complicated it is, the more it costs and the easier it is to brake, at least in my opinion.
- DiGGY

poiwe_11

from cabuyao, laguna

♥jc♥ is that afordable????

What about a glove that could be motion sensored that would have the same idea as a touch screen but only you wouldnt be touching the screen? But a thin enough glove that will be easy to type. So basically you could still have your hand on the desk and move it as you would a mouse. I was thinking as the pointer finger as the main clicker(as on a mouse, the left), the middle finger would have the same function as the right side of a mouse and the ring finger as the scroller(on some mouses, the middle). And have a keyboard that when you need to type the keyboard detects that you are needing to type so you arent clicking all over the place. But in a way if someone were to make this, if it isnt already(Im not sure), it shouldnt be that expensive.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


November 2009: Astronaut 3.0

Inside NASA's astronaut bootcamp and the grueling new training regimen for deep space. Plus, ten young geniuses shaking up science today, one writer's quest to analyze every man-made chemical in her body and more.

Check out the issue's full contents online here

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg