Formula 1 cars are the most technologically advanced racecars on the planet. There's a reason why most American racing fans don't much care.

Illustration by Ross MacDonald Illustration by Ross MacDonald

Damon Runyon wrote that sailboat racing was as exciting as watching grass grow. After the Grand Prix of San Marino in Italy this year I decided that F1 is as exciting as watching time-lapse photography of grass growing: vastly faster, momentarily fascinating, ultimately tedious.


The momentary fascination is the sound of V10 piston engines turning at turbine speeds. At 18,000 rpm-yes, 18,000 rpm-the titanium connecting rods actually stretch enough that the slight elasticity has to be taken into account lest the demitasse-size pistons smite the heads. That's an explosion of fuel in each combustion chamber 150 times every second. When you have listened just once to a full field of such engines winding up for the green light, you're probably two years closer to needing a hearing aid. What you hear on the Speed Channel's TV broadcasts of F1 races is a wimpy whisper of actuality.


In the time it takes a good sports car to accelerate from zero to 60, an F1 car will be doing 150-on its way to 220-mph road-course straightaway speeds. The top F1 teams develop their cars in rolling-road wind tunnels, and the downforce their aerodynamics generate is so enormous-up to 5,000 pounds-that the cars could easily race upside down on an inverted track, if the corners weren't too slow. Even more impressive than its 2G acceleration force is an F1 car's braking force, which can reach a near-incomprehensible 4Gs. If a 170-pound driver's six-point harness were for some reason to fail under braking, he'd be slammed against the steering wheel with a force of more than half a ton.


Yet what a bore. It's a culture thing. Americans demand more drama. We want a 45-to-42 seesaw Super Bowl; Euros are happy with a 1-zip World Cup game after an hour and a half of footie. F1 fans feel that the best car on the track should win the pole position, should therefore be first through the first turn, never be passed, and finish first. And if the tens of thousands of screaming, flag-waving, airhorn-farting Europeans at the track in the northern Italian city of Imola might have wished for a bit more action-there were just two passes of consequence during the entire race, one of them in the first few hundred yards of the first lap-for them the outcome of what was essentially a high-speed parade was still satisfying. The two hugely powerful home-team Ferraris were one-two in the same order in which they'd started, the Williams BMWs on slightly less effective tires were three-four ditto, and everybody else was a supporting player.





Page 1 of 2 12next ›last »

0 Comments


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif