Ethics Training For Deadly Drones

A new program seeks to develop ethics for the future's autonomous weapons

By Stuart Fox Posted 06.18.2009 at 5:37 pm 3 Comments

Ethics-bot? : USAF

As unmanned drones become a larger part of how America makes war, fully autonomous fighting robots seem less a possibility than an eventuality. But how do we ensure that these future autonomous weapons conform to the ethics we would expect from a human combatant?

To prevent a robot from ever taking the field without the same code of conduct flesh and blood soldiers follow, Ron Arkin, a robotics engineer at the Georgia Institute of Technology, has begun writing computer programs that could help robots follow an ethical code in the heat of battle. And although his military-funded project is not designed to produce ethics software for actual future robots, it has generated interesting results nonetheless.

The main problem revolves around the complexity of human ethics. It was easy for Arkin to design a program, based on an actual 2006 encounter in Afghanistan, that would prevent an autonomous UAV from firing on subjects in a graveyard, a violation of the laws of war. However, many of the other missions Arkin selected as examples had far less clear-cut rules. And since robots follow clear cut rules, programing for those engagements proved much more difficult.

One odd outgrowth of this program are pieces of software that aims to provide not more human rules for machines, but more robot-like advice for humans. Noting that robots don't seek revenge or feel prejudices, the program has spawned investigation into an artificially intelligence adviser for soldiers that would give clear ethical suggestions in situations when humans might be distracted by emotions.

Man and machine, working together for a more ethical world. Almost takes the fun out of being a liquid metal robot, doesn't it?

[via New Scientist]

Previous Article: Finding Nature's Most Efficient Flight Mechanism

Next Article: Herschel Space Telescope's First Images Give Promising Glimpse of What's to Come

Want to read more articles on the military, aviation, and space? Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

3 Comments

Link to this comment

Yeah Right

06/18/09 at 11:19 pm

Sounds cool but if negative emotions cause a well trained person to ignore their training, (and we all know that emotions can over power senses at times) then I don't see how an electronic adviser yapping about the right thing to do is going to make much difference. But perhaps it could be useful in less volatile situations.

Link to this comment

ghost

06/20/09 at 3:30 am

they already have that, it's called a conscience...

anyways if you did have a robot that acted like a conscience then the first word out of it's speaker should be what are you doing, followed by why? because if you can get somebody to think about what they are doing then they will be able to rationalize better.

it's the same thing the conscience does but this one is an actual voice, but at the same time you can tune out any noise, no matter how annoying it might be...

Link to this comment

patrickegan

08/15/09 at 12:38 pm

We have to be very careful with the concept of magic machines killing people, especially innocents. During the last administrations tenure the public was very concerned about world opinion. The use of these “killing machines” is starting to create an international propaganda backlash.

Technology

+ More Photo Galleries

June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.