Do You Have a Bomb-Defusing Ray Gun to Spare? The Navy Would Like a Word

Despite years of failure, the Navy continues to look for futuristic solutions to the IED problem

By Stuart Fox Posted 06.04.2009 at 12:17 pm 4 Comments

IED, Iraq, August 3, 2005 nukeit1 (CC Licensed)

The U.S. Navy is still looking for an energy ray to defeat IEDs. However, unlike previous attempts, the new technology they're dreaming of would render the explosives inert, rather than prematurely detonate them.

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), also often referred to as roadside bombs, have been the deadliest weapon used by anti-U.S. forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The devices prey on the U.S. military's dependence on roads for logistics; they target supply convoys and patrols alike. Unfortunately, many of these mines can't distinguish between U.S. Marines in a Humvee and an Iraqi or Afghan family in an Opel, leading to many civilian deaths as well.

All previous attempts to counter roadside bombs with electromagnetic radiation have failed spectacularly.

With this new proposal, the Navy hopes to avoid making the same mistake a fourth time. The solicitation for ray designs states that the technology the Navy is interested in would break down the explosive devices by altering the explosives themselves, as opposed to simply heating or zapping them until they blow up. The Navy doesn't specify exactly how this would work, noting only that the reaction should occur "at the molecular level."

Interestingly enough, while the Navy continues to look for high-tech solutions to the IED problem, a report by Lieutenant Colonel Thomas H. Magness, the head engineer at the National Training Center, claims that "the most effective way to prevent the effects of IED on friendly forces is to deny the enemy the opportunity to ever get an IED on the ground."

Yeah, but fancy, expensive energy weapons are so cool.

[via Wired's Danger Room]

Previous Article: Want To Know North Korea's Secrets? Check Google Earth

Next Article: Space: The Ugliest Frontier?

Want to read more articles on the military, aviation, and space? Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

4 Comments

Link to this comment

rlenston

06/04/09 at 1:14 pm

I'd like to see lot's of private investment in this, and not tax dollars, considering the vague requirements.

Link to this comment

animemaster

06/06/09 at 3:31 am

There using a secret cancer ray to carcinogenarate the bombs to death. Cancer in bombs is particularly fatal and rapid because they lack a proper immune system.

Link to this comment

LVmikey

06/16/09 at 5:47 pm

Place an open both ends 55 or 33 gal drum over IED , fill with liquid nitrogen, wait till evaporates at which time the EID will not be able to trigger the detonater due to the extreme cold ( -320 fahrenheit ) after which can be disassembled safely.

Link to this comment

JMcIntyre001

09/04/09 at 10:05 pm

Liquid nitrogen is the way to go. You must be careful that it isn't a bomb that goes off when the voltage goes down (as would happen with Liquid Nitrogen treatment), but otherwise it's safe. A 33 gallon drum is a bit large and would take large amounts of Liquid nitrogen. You'd best pour it from an insulated container directly on the bomb. It wouldn't take much to freeze it - it would definitely kill mercury switches.

Once it is frozen, you could even hit it with a sledgehammer and smash it. It will basically just shatter.

Another idea would be to drill into the side of an IED and pump steam into it. Some bombs would just turn to jelly in the steam and pour out onto the side of the road.

Technology

+ More Photo Galleries

July 2013: The Future Of Flight

The incredible innovations, like drone swarms and perpetual flight, bringing aviation into the world of tomorrow. Plus: today's greatest sci-fi writers predict the future, the science behind the summer's biggest blockbusters, a Doctor Who-themed DIY 'bot, the organs you can do without, and much more.