Science Lit
Popular Science talks to the author of How to Live on Mars about the prospects for a move to the red planet

You've been called a "Mars maverick" and the "Christopher Columbus of Mars." Why do think you've earned those titles?

Becky Sherman:  Robert Murray

I've never attached those titles to myself, but why might someone choose to call me that? Columbus was passionate. He spent 20 years wandering from court to court trying to convince someone to give him enough money and a couple of ships to sail west. Now, no practical person would spend good money on good ships to just sail them off with no purpose in a direction that no ship had ever come back from. But Columbus finally did it. There's a statue of Columbus in New York City, and it says "To the world, he gave a world." On page 136 of my book, the picture of the statue of the character Becky Sherman is copied from that statue of Columbus.

It's a common view that Columbus was just interested in finding a spice route to the Indies, and that was his sales pitch to the Spanish courts. But I actually believe that contrary to conventional history, Columbus was looking for unknown continents -- he just couldn't pitch it that way. Wernher von Braun pitched going to the moon to John F. Kennedy as a way of winning the Cold War. But in fact, von Braun had been interested in space exploration since the 1920s. So I don't think we went to the moon because of the Cold War; I think the people who wanted to go to the moon had to sell the idea in Cold War terms. Ultimately, they were interested in expanding humanity into space.

So in that sense, I guess I am like Columbus. For the past 20 years I've been trying to make the case for reaching for Mars. Things happen because people make them happen. But I haven't earned the Columbus title yet because I haven't made it happen.

What will it take to realize a manned mission to Mars?

It will take a president who is willing to stand up in the spring of his first term in office and commit the nation to getting humans to Mars by the end of the second term. That's the only way it can be done. It can't be done if someone says, "Well, I think NASA should go to Mars eventually and I would like them to put it on the planning charts for the year 2050." That's meaningless. What Kennedy said was, "We need to do this before the decade is out," which effectively meant before the end of his second term. If Kennedy had said, "I want to be to the moon by the year 2000" instead of 1970, we never would have made it to the moon, and space historians today would be saying, "Oh yes, someone had this idea about going to the moon back in 1961, but obviously we all know it never really could have happened."

So, it takes vision and it takes commitment. And this is what George W. Bush lacked when he gave his "Vision for Space Exploration" speech in 2004, when he basically said (paraphrased), "I think we should have a visionary space program and you can start one after I leave office if you like."

With the Phoenix mission and the Mars Exploration Rovers in the news during the past few years, there are doubtless many young people who have been inspired to pursue a career in space exploration. What advice would you give them?

I grew up in the 1960s and wanted to become part of the great space exploration effort, but when I graduated from college in 1974 the Apollo program was over and the country had moved into this pessimistic mode. We had entered the "age of limits." For awhile I accepted that and went off from my chosen path and became a high school science teacher. And that's a very noble profession, but it wasn't my dream. Then at a certain point I said to myself, "This is not what I wanted to be doing when I was growing up." So I went back to graduate school, got myself some engineering degrees and got a job at Martin Marietta -- which then became Lockheed Martin -- doing preliminary design of interplanetary missions. And I've been able to participate in the space program. It has been an enormous adventure, and who knows -- I may succeed in making this happen. But if not, I've lived a life I've always dreamed of living. So what I say is, if you want to be a space explorer, then do what is necessary to be a space explorer. Push yourself to get the qualifications and get involved, whether on the industry side, or the NASA side, or the university side.

People make their own fates, and if enough of us make our fate to be space explorers, perhaps we can actually get some space exploration done.

Mars is not the final destination here, it's just the direction. There are worlds beyond, and if we can open up Mars, it will be a statement that there is not just one world for humanity -- that we have an open universe and an open future before us, with many new worlds and many possibilities.

How to Live on Mars will be released on December 2 online and in bookstores.

Page 2 of 2 « first‹ previous12
Want to read more articles on the military, aviation, and space? Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

9 Comments

Mike Cook

from Kent, WA

To get to Mars first we have to get to Phobos as fast as possible as absolute speed lessens the human exposure to interstellar radiation, especially solar flares that are unpredictable when starting out on the journey. Also our consumption of consumables will be much less, meaning we don't have to take so much with us.

So, let's go fast. Instead of a leisurely 12 month or more journey from Earth to the vicinity of Mars that mostly involves coasting after an initial acceleration, let's accelerate the whole way, using every speed booster we can think of, from solar sail to ion engine. If we could cut the trip to three months one-way, we dramatically make the mission easier to manage. Some dangers would be increased, but many would be dramatically decreased by the shortening of transit time.

Then, when we near Phobos, let's use it as our emergency brake--i.e. a large mass that we reach out and grab or snag to slow ourselves down. Some type of pre-positioned structure would greatly aid in this. In a patent (pending) I have suggested a simple lasso of high tech carbon fiber, but other ideas have been suggested that might work as well, including elaborate tight beam projectors to slow an approaching spacecraft.

The important thing is that speed is wonderful. Also acceleration, because human beings really like the feeling of gravity. It is good for us. Once we get down to the surface of Mars we will experience a little gravity, but it would still be a good idea to exercise every day in a full 1-g centrifuge.

I dream of going to/living on/recreating on Mars. This is a life long dream that I certainly hope will soon be a reality. Thank you POPSCI for this interesting and great article. For more on Mars recreation see www.ootwo.com and go to any of the Mars pages, I think there are 3 or four. Plus in the blog section there are some fun articles as well.

I just read this book (found it on the shelf at Borders yesterday, despite the release date cited) - it's hard to describe since it's actually serious on several levels (sci-tech, social-political, philosophical even) but just a hoot all around. HIGHLY recommended.

Mr. Cook I have to say your plan is pretty far-fetched. Number one, carrying fuel for constant ignition would be stupidly heavy, and would never even get off the ground just from the shear weight of it. Also, Phobos is a horribly irregularly shaped moon, and is more of a large asteroid than a moon, and hooking some lasso catcher's mitt to it is pretty out there. Let's say we could ship out some robots to phobos that could hook it up. Let's even say that it works, and that it could catch a spacecraft, that has been constantly accelerating in a frictionless environment for three months, the force behind this craft would be so immense, one of three things would happen:

1. the tension on the high tech rubber band would snap, flinging the spacecraft and crew off at a completely unpredictable trajectory, pretty much ensuring their death.

2. the band would hold, but the elasticity of it after extreme tension would just hurl it back the way it came, ensuring their death as well.

3. the band would hold, but the G forces behind so much acceleration would smash the craft like a soda can with a sledgehammer.

Not to mention how small phobos really is, at only 22.2km in diameter (a 15 minute drive) such a tug from something traveling so fast would throw off ITS trajectory as well, potentially causing the moon's destruction into Mars or just really screwing with its orbit, which is something its handling just fine on its own. We're already destroying most of our planet, i don't want to start solar system exploration with such irresponsibility as well.

I believe we should take small steps first. Colonizing Mars would be a very ambitious project indeed. I believe that we should try to colonize the moon first, then from there if everything turns out well we could turn to colonizing Mars or one of its moons Deimos or Phobos.

I know that it would be difficult for us to colonize the Moon but we have to start there first and there will be mistakes because we do not know every scenario that might take place even though we try to anticipate everything but there are some things that might be overlooked then once we have encountered them, then we might have a better understanding of how to colonize Mars. Besides, it would take a lot of resources like fuel for the trip to Mars - and the Moon is relatively nearer to us.

Maybe build something like a biosphere in the Moon first or make it habitable and then Mars...

Mr. Cook must be talking of a future when we'll have
a reusable Endeavour with an ion engine that half way to Mars does a 180 spin to reduce its speed. I was thinking that by having such ship we could use it to play billiards with comets and meteorites by using nukes to bombard Mars
to accelerate its terraforming, I saw something like
this in the Discovery channel. Well, I was wondering what would happen to Mars after colliding with something big and filled with water like Europa the moon of Jupiter, would it become more like the earth?

Mike Cook

from Kent, WA

Hi Brpagel: Thanks for the technical analysis--which forces my brain up to speed after a dull shift at the day job. I didn't say anything about taking chemical fuel to burn on a constant acceleration to Mars. I said ion engine, which gives about double the fuel mileage. Also, the faster you go, the smaller you can make the spaceship, because you need to carry along fewer supplies.

Perhaps the best solution would be a focused beam propulsion system. Others have proposed building the base station on our Luna with a huge nuclear power plant, which would basically project a tight but humungous amount of laser energy at a heat shield/mirror on the departing end of the spaceship. This would give a constant push. If enough power is available to provide even a .5 g acceleration that would soon amount to a very high velocity. Then another beam projector on Phobos begins a .5 deceleration of the spaceship. The final step will be actually putting out high tensile strength ropes which would stretch to aid deceleration, with strain gauges monitoring to let out more cable if necessary to prevent snapping. Then you winch the spaceship in to Phobos (or the moon of any planet to which you may want to go at a high rate of speed.)

The fate of Phobos ultimately is to fall into Mars anyhow, as other Mars moons have done. Our techniques will actually delay that because we are adding energy to Phobos, not taking it away. Over repeated launches and recoveries of spacecraft we can calculate things so as to prevent the orbit of Phobos from becoming too eccentric.

Hello Mr. Mike Cook, you're proposing that the ship would travel at 5 Gs for it to reach its destination of Phobos early.

But, how long will that 5 G acceleration be? Coz if it would be months I don't think that humans could withstand that amount of Gs for a very long time. Or could they, I'm thinking that maybe they have to decelerate or stop everytime they have to eat, sleep or eat, am I right?

Besides the focused light beam propulsion that you've proposed... is there something like that in existence right now. And if so, wouldn't there be attenuation of the amplified power due to the distance involved? Sorry am grasping at straws here coz am not knowledgable about propulsion systems and other stuff. But, are my ideas valid or not?

Having read Robert Zubrin's "The Case for Mars" and "Entering Space", I was deeply impressed with his no-nonsense approach to getting a human presence on Mars as simply, cheaply and safely as possible. He emphasises the goal of Martian settlement as an extension of the human imperative to expand our territory and continue to push back our frontiers.

I couldn't agree more, but one thing I don't remember him mentioning is this: When we have another large impactor like the Chixalub meteor that ended the dinosaurs' reign, our fragile species will be extinguished if we have all our eggs in this one planetary basket.
Mars is our best local candidate for a backup. If we have a self-sustaining and genetically diverse community established when he Big One hits Earth, we can re-seed Mama or simply continue outward, carrying the essence and accumulated knowledge of humanity. Life will continue in the cracks and crevices of Earth, but not our life.
Thus shall the meek truly inherit the Earth.
I only hope that President Obama can see the wisdom in making Mars Direct happen before the end of his term.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg