PopSci's FYI experts tackle any likelihood

Overland: The Apollo-era moon rover ran on battery power NASA

When the Apollo astronauts drove around on the moon, they had to settle for a little buggy. But if you want to tour the Sea of Tranquility in the family SUV or a Ferrari, well, you're looking at more than a few weekends under the hood.

"Your average car faces several major problems on the moon," says Brian Wilcox, who heads the development of NASA's new manned rover, called Athlete [see NASA's Gilded Chariot]. Chief among those is the small matter of combustion. There's no oxygen on the moon, so your engine can't burn fuel to generate power. In addition, your rubber tires would crack or melt on the surface, where temperatures range from that of liquid nitrogen to boiling water.

The upgrades are fairly straightforward. You could swap your Firestones for a set of NASA's metal mesh lunar-grade tires. You'd need to get rid of that combustion engine, too. An electric engine running on hydrogen fuel cells would perform best in the lunar environment, Wilcox says.

You'd want to keep your trips brief, though. On the surface of the atmosphere-free moon, there's no protecting yourself from cosmic rays, which at lunar-intensity levels can increase your risk of developing cancer by 3 percent in just six months. If you're the cautious type, you might consider two-inch-thick, water-filled panels to block the protons spewed from the occasional solar flare, which could kill you in less than an hour.

Once you'd made these modifications, you would reap some nice benefits. Because gravity on the moon is one sixth that of Earth, your engine wouldn't have to work as hard to propel your car, so you'd score six times as many miles per charge as you would here. And there's never any traffic. Of course, you'd have to get your car up there. NASA's going freight rate to the moon runs around $25,000 a pound, so delivering a one-ton car would cost $50 million. Those two-seater buggies left behind from the Apollo missions don't sound so bad after all.

Want to read more articles on the military, aviation, and space? Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

3 Comments

"Because gravity on the moon is one sixth that of Earth, your engine wouldn't have to work as hard to propel your car, so you'd score six times as many miles per charge as you would here."
The author obviously neglected one thing, that the surface of the moon is not as smooth as the roads on the earth.
Go to http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Moon/surface.html and you'll find "the whole [moon] surface is covered with regolith", which makes driving on the moon is no easier than driving in the sands.

How about modifying a golf cart for use on the Moon?? All ready done. See www.ootwo.com/moon.asp . FORE!!!!!

sweet. know one thing the author left out? FREE GAS DUDE!!! okay, think about it. on the moon, the only thing you can use is electricity; in one form or another.

1. use solar panel golf carts during the day -- the sun is stronger on the moon because of the lack of atmosheric absorbsion, so don't say it won't work--

2. use the same soler panels to charge batteries to drive around during the night.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg