Soldiers who manage to walk away from explosions in Iraq may actually be suffering terrible—yet invisible—brain trauma. Could blast waves be fueling a new breed of injury?

Ever since her pioneering study, Cernak has been trying to prove her theory that blast waves indirectly damage the brain, and to figure out how. She is now the medical director of the national-security technology department at Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory. She spends much of her time working with the engineers in the APL’s Impact Biomechanics Test Facility, which houses a hydraulic impact sled for testing car seats and a 60-foot-long steel pipe called a shock tube that simulates the force of a blast wave.

From the protection of the impact lab’s control room, one of Cernak’s colleagues punches in a computer command to fill a chamber at one end of the shock tube with compressed air and then fire it down the tube at 760 miles per hour. Today’s target is a pink plastic torso complete with synthetic organs and dozens of pressure and acceleration sensors to measure the impact of the blast. But Cernak’s usual mark is a rodent.
In one of her most cited studies, Cernak compared the brains of rats whose entire bodies were exposed to the blast with another group whose heads and necks were protected with steel helmets. She found that even animals whose heads were perfectly immobilized and shielded develop the biological hallmarks of traumatic brain injury: broken-down nerve pathways, swollen brain cells, accelerated cell death, and the buildup of gunk you would expect to see in a brain-tissue sample of an Alzheimer’s patient. The findings suggest that helmets alone may fail to protect the brain from a blast. If true, then combat vests may not only need to deflect the shrapnel from an explosion but also dampen blast-wave frequencies.

How can a blast jump-start brain decay? Cernak theorizes that the rapid compression of organs and tissue in the torso sends a spike of energy rippling through the vessels, including those that loop through the brain. She envisions tiny bursts of pressure that squeeze brain cells and warp the connections between them in ways that are too subtle to show up on standard MRI scans. It’s the cumulative result of stretching nerve endings, she believes, that triggers a domino effect of chemical and molecular changes that damage brain cells and disrupt the normal flow of information. It takes time for these changes to snowball, and she thinks this explains what she calls a “slow cooking” of lab animals’ brain cells that can lead to long-term tissue degeneration. It might also explain why some soldiers’ symptoms never seem to clear up.

STRETCHED TO THE LIMIT: Shock waves can damage healthy brain cells. [left] Sometimes just lightly twisting the cell is enough to do the job.

THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL: The shearing not only causes physical damage to cells but can also unleash a biochemical cascade that eventually causes cells to self-destruct [right].

 Medi-Mation

School of Hard Knocks

Cernak’s lab is not alone in the search. Among the experiments in Darpa’s program, called PREVENT (for Preventing Violent Explosive Neurologic Trauma), researchers are exposing pigs to live munitions and then analyzing their brain tissue for damage. During the explosions, sensors record the full range of physical characteristics of the blast, including peak pressure, the frequency of the blast wave, the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) generated by the blast, the burst of light, the volume of noise, and even the gases generated.

Geoffrey Ling, who oversees PREVENT, believes that most scientists are focused too narrowly on the effects of blast pressure. He’s not at all convinced that it’s the culprit—or at least not the only one. He points out, for instance, that an electromagnetic pulse could affect electrochemical impulses in the brain, but nobody has studied this possibility. Ling notes that steel helmets worn in World War II and Vietnam reflect EMPs, whereas today’s Kevlar helmets don’t. “A 155-millimeter artillery shell sends out an EMP so strong that it will short-circuit our radios,” he says. “If there is something that could short-circuit an electrical pathway in the brain, that could disrupt function, I really want to rule that out.”

Pig data is telling, but there’s no substitute for a controlled study on humans. One of the most promising is a clinical trial involving breachers. These are the soldiers who blast down doors to storm buildings and, as a result, are guaranteed to get their bells rung on a regular basis. Lee Ann Young, a mechanical engineer who works for Albuquerque defense contractor Applied Research Associates, is studying a group of Marines as they go through breacher school at their base in Quantico, Virginia. Before, during and after their training, they will undergo MRIs and neurobehavioral testing for hearing and balance. They will be outfitted with pressure gauges to measure the strength of each of up to 40 blasts that they will be exposed to over a two-week period. “They’re very low-level blasts,” Young says. “I’ve been in the room, and it doesn’t feel that much different than the thump of a speaker at a loud rock concert. The question is whether it’s causing some sort of cumulative neurological impairments.”

As more stories like Hussey’s come out, some experts worry about fomenting fear of a mysterious widespread epidemic. Many make comparisons to the controversy over Gulf War syndrome, a much-debated affliction marked by fatigue, headache, dizziness and respiratory disorders. But although numerous questions remain about what Cernak calls blast-induced neurotrauma, she believes that if scientists accept it as a possibility, there is hope that it can be diagnosed and treated, and perhaps even prevented. “It is not a doomed message,” she says. “It is not that you were exposed to a blast, therefore you have a brain injury. But if you don’t do anything, the potentially reversible changes can become irreversible.”

It’s possible that mental exercises such as the ones Hussey practices could improve some cognitive symptoms, given the brain’s marked ability to heal itself. But the best medicine of all, Hussey says, was simply getting medical validation of his problems. “I wanted things to make sense to me,” he says. “My two weeks down in Tampa answered a lot of questions—a lot of it about my own sanity. I was wondering if it was just me. I don’t feel hopeless anymore.”

8 Comments

Are you sure that Rand survey was talking about all deployed troops? That number seems high, and I wonder if they weren't referring to front line soldiers.
Anyone have a direct reference?

Perhaps would be good to try a Faraday cage kind of system integrated inside a helmet.
That's a way to protect from EMP

The first commentor may have been dropped on his head as a child. I suffered a TBI in 1991 and spent the next fifteen years recovering from it. When I awoke from an induced coma, my IQ had been cut in half. I was Forrest Gump without the math. It took 15 years to get it back to 124, still a 20% loss of cognitive function. And will they even have that much to spare? I still suffer the sequeli today.
Is the army willing to put the monies needed for thousands to recover from this type of long term disability. Or are we headed to a situation like the post vietnam era. With untreated soliers living under bridges and self medicating with drugs and alcohol.

The brief but extreme blast forces on the thorax and abdomen force venous and arterial blood as well as cerebral spinal fluid retrograde into the cranium like multiple caliber shotgun blasts through foramina or openings at the base of the skull. The brain, having no place to go, receives multiple traumatic squeezing forces due to the different diameters of these openings. Neuroimaging should reveal evidence of injury in keeping with these anatomic alterations along the inferior surfaces of the brain and along the course of major vascular supply and CSF spaces. I propose preventing or reducing these blast forces by wearing a blast resistant, hard shell of strong carbon composite material over the entire chest and abdomen minimizing these pressures to the brain and thereby preventing these devastating injuries.

i'm not sure, what is needed, but the one thing thats certain is that a much better system is needed to protect our troops!

I FOUND THAT THIS ARTICLE IS CORRECT IN THE SYPTOMS, BUT WRONG IN THE REASON. THIS IS BATTLE FATIGUE, AND THE SAME AS THE VIETNAM VETERANS SUFFERED.
THE EARLY ARTICLE IN THE SAME ISSUE IS VERY ACCURATE.
LONG PERIONS OF STRESS = PLUS A MAJOR SHOCK OF ANY KIND IS THE ISSUE.
IT PRODUCES CORTISON WHICH DAMAGES THE HIPPOCAMPUR AND THE ENTIRE PITUATARY GLAND. THIS AFFECT THE ENTIRE BODAY. THE DIAGRAM AT THE END IS EXTREMELY CORRECT IN THE RUSULT. RESEACH IT YOURSELF AND FIND OUT.

Mike Cook

from Kent, WA

Way back in the 1950's and 1960's there was a German guy who had survived a grenade explosion next to his body in W.W.II and developed a theory about how a properly positioned human body can survive an explosion if the shrapnel doesn't kill the subject. The ex-soldier developed a carnival routine which I witnessed during a demolition derby half-time. He built a coffin out of cheap plywood and about a foot from the head of it was placed a stick of 50% dynamite. Then he would lay down in the coffin without even a helmet and detonate the explosive, spectacularly demolishing the coffin and leaving himself unharmed.

As an entertainment routine this act was spectacular (I believe I read about it in Popular Science before actually seeing it) but took place so quickly that the guy had to do a lot of talking and build-up in order to hold 15 minutes of the audience's attention until a climax that would only take a micro-second.

In his heavily accented English the guy admitted that he had gone deaf from doing this stunt. He also said that the closest he had come to being really hurt was when he performed the routine out on the end of a pier at a marina show in Florida. The plan was that the blast would drop him spectacularly into the water. It worked as planned but what he didn't know is that explosions create a great amount of static electricity. As soon as he contacted the water he suffered serious burns over a good part of his body.

I can't remember his name other than that it was German.

So, shockwaves from explosions can damage the human body... How is this a surprise really? Receiving an abrupt blow to the head can lead to coma, but apprarently having a grenade explode a couple of meters from the head cannot be dangerous??

This kind of reminds me of the first experiments with atomic weaponry, noone thought the radiation could be "bad" - we all know how that turned out.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg