The latest science on how your cells make you who you are
Posted 09.17.2008 at 12:30 pm
4 Comments
The New Genetics
Andrew Syred/Photo Researchers
Epigenetics is the idea that, contrary to decades of genetic theory, your genetic code isn’t the only thing that controls how your cells behave. Scientists now realize that chemicals and other environmental influences that can modify the physical structure of your DNA are at least as important as the actual genetic code. Even more surprising, these modifications are inheritable. It’s possible, for example, that your grandmother’s poor diet could affect your own health by making your DNA harder to read for the proteins that help maintain cellular functions.
Instant Expert: Launch Your Quick and Easy Primer on Just About Everything at popsci.com/instantexpert.
4 Comments
To comment, please Login.
138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Innovation Challenges
Popular Science+ For iPad
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Download Our App
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Follow Us On Twitter
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
.jpg)
February 2012: The Future of Fun
Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?
Popular on Popsci
Most Viewed
Science
- Gallery: The Best Way to Unbuild a Dam
- This Week in the Future, February 6-10, 2012
- The Most Amazing Science Images of the Week, February 6-10, 2012
- Images of the Week, February 6-10, 2012
- A Smartphone That Detects Whether Its User Is Depressed
- Found: The Oldest Animal Ever on Planet Earth
- Video Microscopy Unveils the Tricks of Nature's Toughest Glue, Oozed By a Bacterium
- 3-D Laser Maps Show How Major Quakes Rend the Earth
- Doctors Grow Parkinsonian Human Brain Cells In Vitro, Shedding Light on the Genetics of the Disease
- An Oral History of Extreme Sports
Most Emailed
Science
- This Week in the Future, February 6-10, 2012
- The Most Amazing Science Images of the Week, February 6-10, 2012
- Images of the Week, February 6-10, 2012
- A Smartphone That Detects Whether Its User Is Depressed
- Found: The Oldest Animal Ever on Planet Earth
- Video Microscopy Unveils the Tricks of Nature's Toughest Glue, Oozed By a Bacterium
- 3-D Laser Maps Show How Major Quakes Rend the Earth
- Doctors Grow Parkinsonian Human Brain Cells In Vitro, Shedding Light on the Genetics of the Disease
- An Oral History of Extreme Sports
- 200,000-Year-Old Patch of Seagrass Is the World's Oldest Living Organism
Most Commented
Science
- Russian Scientists Drilling into "Alien" Antarctic Lake Vostok Fall Silent
- 10-Year-Old Accidentally Creates New Molecule in Science Class
- Should Scientists Be Held Legally Responsible for Their Results?
- Hilarious "Theory of Everything" Paper Provokes Kerfuffle
- FYI: Do Animals Dream?
- New Climate Change Culprit: Chilean Man Stealing Glaciers to Put In Cocktails
- The Best Way to Unbuild a Dam
- Zapping Testicles With Ultrasonic Pulses Shown To Be Effective Contraceptive
- MIT Scientist Offers $100,000 to Anyone Who Can Prove Quantum Computing Is Impossible
- Found: The Oldest Animal Ever on Planet Earth
Today on PopSci.com
Copyright © 2009 Popular Science
A Bonnier Corporation Company. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Is this enough basis or reason for the need of genetic "tinkering" in the future? (?_?)
Isnt that logical. I tought it was a common knowledge so far. Its a case of addaption, continuity, and learning process.
Food=protiens=growth, makes perfect sense if you ask me. We are just now realizing that environmental factors as well as many others contribute to the growth and development of ourselves? along with the overall development of our genetic structure? As koxl said i thought it was common knowledge. As far as mr. Smoltz is concerned genetic reconstruction and reconfiguration may seem like an act against god to some but then again think about how many lives we would possibly be able to save if we could shut off or even remove a genome responsible for heart desease.
Smoltz: We have never required a reason for our tinkering. We just tinker. Tinkering has lifted us out of the bogs of Europe and out of the plains of Africa. Tinkering has taken us to the moon and extended our lifespans far beyond what they once were. We will tinker our way to the stars or we will die tinkering.
Cogito Ergo Tinker.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley