
Try talking to someone below the water and you’ll understand the difficulty of underwater sound. The impedance of water is 3,600 times that of air. What little sound is transmitted beneath the water relies more on bone conduction through the middle and inner ear than the traditional route through the eardrum. There’s a 62-decibel offset between sound in the air and that in water. Normal talking is approximately 60 db, meaning communicating at that same relative intensity requires 122 db in the pool. Doesn’t sound that bad till you realize 120 db is somewhere between the noise level created by a jet airliner and that of the threshold for human pain.
But swimmers can’t perform flamingos and cranes in unison if the music is only audible above the water. So, Oceanears technology provides a method for getting the sound out without breaking the bank. Most air based audio speakers rely on a moving coil design that requires a large displacement of air molecules to create noise. According to Harper, moving water that long distance causes problems. Instead, Oceanears speakers rely on piezoelectric technology similar to smaller, above-water tweeters. Voltage applied to ceramic causes much smaller vibrations that are nearly invisible to the naked eye. With water molecules much more tightly packed than those in air, the small displacements can put out much bigger sounds under the water than on ground.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.

my original intention was to comment on the articles seemingly sexist reference to these elite athletes as "attractive blondes". but, after looking it up, the 2008 olympic team is composed of a large majority of blonde women which just makes me wonder if pop sci has fully explored the scientific correlation between blonde hair and exceptional synchronized swimming ability.
I think the correlation is between spending 48-60 hours a week in a chlorinated pool and becoming blonde.