Frugal Mogul

This Hollywood-grade camera is priced for the backyard, not the back lot

Hollywood Connected: Among the accessories Scarlet supports are mics, headphones, a Wi-Fi remote and possibly a plug-in hard drive. Red

Although high-def camcorders shoot incredible detail, they are a far cry from Hollywood gear. But the Red Scarlet, due out later this year, will capture five-megapixel video frames, picking up more than twice the detail of high-def camcorders and rivaling the eight-megapixel flicks that A-list directors are starting to shoot.

Even if you’re not gunning for an Oscar, you’ll appreciate the extra resolution. In editing, you can crop out half of a scene and still have enough pixels to fill an HD screen. The Scarlet, which will be priced at about $3,000, should capture cleaner images too, thanks to its 58-square-millimeter video sensor, which dwarfs the average 17-square-millimeter chips in consumer models and matches pricier pro rigs. In place of the heavy MPEG compression that consumer cams use to squeeze more footage onto tapes or DVDs, Scarlet employs high-quality “wavelet” compression—used for films shown in digital cinemas—and records video to a pair of compact flash cards that you can interchange for continuous shooting.

It may cost three bills, but that’s a small price for gear that’s worthy of a blockbuster production.

2 Comments

Fionn

from Kenner, L.A.

For $3,000 you better be able to make your own movie with it.

$3000 is nothing for this kind of resolution. This chip is comparable to ones found in cameras costing $100,000. But you better add a little extra to your budget. Additional lenses from Red cost $5000 and up (each), plus power and hard drive storage is going to run a couple grand. You'll probably need to upgrade your editing system or at least your storage, too, for all that digital data, and maybe invest in a digital archiving system (there's no tape to shelve, you re-use the drives.)

Still a great deal for an amazing product (I hope to get one in early 2009) but you have to be realistic about the cost. It's not really $3000.

Popular Tags

Regular Features

  • The Grouse with Tom Conlon | Tech's shortcomings exposed

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!

Subscribe for 2 free issues!

POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg