Machines get smarter but most still won't talk to each other. There's a DIY way around that problem.

Hummingbirds: Day after day in warm weather they would zing up to the feeder outside my office window, and every time I saw one out of the corner of my eye I thought how nice it would be to get some good pictures. Nice, but not quite worth sitting motionless behind a lens for great chunks of time to get the perfect shot.




So I attached a remote-control button to a camera clamped to the windowsill. But hummingbirds are skittish, and every time my hand left the keyboard to reach for that button the birds flitted off. Then I removed the camera from the clamp and replaced it with a webcam. This was nice, because the webcam software (Oculus) includes motion-detection routines, meaning it will take pictures only when a bird buzzes the feeder. Two new problems emerged: The image-processing activity brought everything else running on my com-puter to an amble, and the resolution was just about good enough to tell the difference between a rubythroat and a really big hornet.



I started thinking about getting an embedded Web server. Actually, what I started thinking about was a device to trigger my SLR camera every time the webcam said there was a bird at the feeder. That turned out to be the embedded server.



To picture the server, think of sites like Google or Yahoo, which employ thousands of high-end CPUs ganged together to answer hundreds of millions of queries a day from all over the world, the equipment occupying whole floors of specially constructed office buildings. Then imagine the opposite, a few $2 chips wired together and a few hundred bytes of software: All it takes to create a tiny server that will answer simple http requests. We're talking about a tiny machine here: A few years back, Hariharasubrahmanian Shrikumar, a graduate student at the University of Massachusetts, built a server in a space slightly larger than the head of a match. The biggest single component in these widgets is typically the modular RJ-45 plug for the Ethernet connector that attaches the server to the rest of cyberspace.



In the best of all possible worlds, I wouldn't need a microserver at all. Networks and communication protocols would already be perfectly tuned for exchanging information between intelligent devices-thermostats, coffeepots, Coke machines, air conditioners, parking meters, sump pumps and so on. Right now we have digital Babel. Committees full of very smart people have been trying to build a perfect solution to the universal gadget- yakking problem for years, and there's no end of the trying in sight. So meanwhile, it's much easier just to embed the aforementioned Web server-a device that legions of techies already know how to make and how to talk to-into whatever widget or appliance needs to acquire communication skills.

Page 1 of 2 12next ›last »

0 Comments


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif