Leica M9 Corinne Iozzio

If a Hummer died and came back as a camera, it would be a Leica -- for many reasons. First, they're built like tanks. Second, even the "small" ones are still huge. And, the most affordable ones are expensive. The just-announced M9 rangefinder and X1 compact are true to Leica form: they're both masterfully constructed cameras that are built to last. But at $7,000, the M9 should have a solid 24K gold shutter at the very least.

The M9 is the world's smallest full-frame system camera. But, as with all Leicas, its 100 percent metal (magnesium and brass) body doesn't make it the lightest; once you slap a lens on it morphs from "portable" to "brick." Its 18-megapixel sensor was specially designed by Kodak for the M9 and captures the full, 24 x 35mm frame. All 22 M-series lenses are, of course, compatible.

The M9 body comes in either an all-black or black-and-silver finishes and will be available for $7,000 this week. Wondering what else you can get for seven grand? That's one 65-inch HDTV, or an entire startup photo studio setup from B&H.

Leica also showed off the 12-megapixel X1 compact. The "beginner" camera in the lineup still allows for manual control of shutter speed, aperture, and focal distance, but adds an auto mode and a pop-up flash. The X1 will go on sale for $2,000 in December.

Oh, and we snapped a couple shots of the new(ish) S2 D-SLR, just for kicks. If you're curious about its price, let me put it this way: buy a car instead (it's $22,000).

Want the latest news on grown-up toys and gadgets, product reviews, sneak peeks, and more? Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

5 Comments

who would get use out of a 18 megapixel sensor? honestly, aside from military surveillance who needs that much detail?

@ meyaht

Apparently, you've never made a print larger than 8" X 10" -- nor have you ever tried to crop a photo to zoom in on a smaller area.

If you just want snapshots, you could probably just stick with your cell phone cam. If you want to shoot portraits, landscapes, or panoramas -- you need plenty of pixels.

Ordinary, high-quality 35 mm film is equivelant to about 15 megapixesl. Large format film is equivelant to over 50 megapixels.

Who needs that much detail? Any serious photographer.

genefowler1

from Livermore, California

As I see it, if the $7K camera does not take good picture the owner would not tell ANYONE.

Well the last comment disappeared into cyberspace so I'll try again - 18 megapixels it not so very much the Nikon D3x is 24 megapixels and Leica's new S2 SLR will have 37.5 megapixels for a cost of around $30,000 - so the M9 is not so expensive really ! - thedigitalcamerasite.blogspot.com/2009/02/leica-s2-slr-digital-camera.html

I love Leica's products. High quality indeed.


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps