Canon EOS 7D:  John Mahoney
Although Nikon was the first to market with HD capture for its DSLRs, Canon has arguably pushed things further forward with the full-frame, 1080p-capable 5D Mark II and sub-$1,000 Rebel T1i. The brand new 7D is the next step--enhancing the movie mode with video geeks' most wanted features, while at the same time integrating features from their top-end 1Ds Mark III family, giving would-be photo pros plenty to covet.

Is this the camera that finally puts the semi-pro digital camcorder firmly in its grave?

We took a prototype for a brief spin, and while it wasn't enough time for anything approaching a definitive judgment, we were able to get a taste for what this camera is trying to accomplish.

First, the basic specs: The 7D is not a continuation/refresh of the 5D line, it's an all-new body (with 1Ds-inspired weather sealing and tweaked ergonomics) with an all new sensor (APS-C, 18-megapixels. Not full frame).

Photographically, the 1Ds family was the direct inspiration. The camera's 19-point autofocus system is a marked increase from the 5D's 9-point system, and the 7D brings to the table a number of new interface enhancements, allowing almost every button on the camera (including a new multi-purpose function button) to be programmed for specific tasks, such as switching between pre-defined focusing and metering schemes with a single touch. Gone are the obscure custom-function menus, and in their place are a number of new physical buttons (including a one-touch RAW + JPEG capture so you don't have to dive into the menus to capture a quick RAW shot while in JPEG mode), as well as an intuitive menu system with graphical cues for assigning custom functions to specific buttons. It's great.

From what we could tell, the new APS-C CMOS sensor appears to be on par with the 5D Mark II's impressive noise-busting capabilities. Here's a shot in Midtown's finest boxing bar, Jimmy's Corner, showing the boosted 12,800 ISO top end:

Noise Comparison At 100% Resolution: The 7D pre-production prototype we shot with still appears to perform well in high-ISO ranges--with the max ISO 12,800 here on the right, and ISO 4000 on the left  John Mahoney

ISO 12,800: See it here in full resolution.

The autofocus system is also tuned to take advantage of Canon's latest image stabilization scheme, which accounts for subtle forward-and-backward shifts as well as side-to-side to keep macro and long telephoto shots in focus and stable. The shutter is the same one found in the 1Ds for 0.059-second response times (rated at 150,000 cycles), as is the viewfinder and prism, which provide 100% coverage.

In short, many pure-photo features previously found only in the same camera pro photojournalists are taking to Afghanistan have been pulled down to a camera aimed at serious enthusiasts and semi-pros, albeit without the full-frame sensor.

And then there are the filmmakers, who Canon clearly had in mind when they further improved the 5D Mark II's already-impressive HD capture mode. People are now shooting feature films with the 5D Mark II, and the 7D answers a lot of filmmakers' wishes: top among them some flexibility in frame rates. The 7D does 1080p at both 29.97 and 23.976 frames per second--the ultra-precise standards used by pro editors (24p and 30p in their parlance). Before, converting to these precise frame rates had to happen separately, but now the camera records those frame rates manually. Drop down to 720p, and you get 59.94 frames per second as well. (European framerates are also covered).

Here is a sample video showing both 24p and 30p at full 1920x1080 resolution (Note, the entire clip has been downsampled and converted to 30fps for the Web. Also, the brief moments of flicker are manual exposure adjustments).


The same manual exposure capability that the 5D Mark II received with a firmware update is back, for tweaking aperture settings during capture. Also the same is the autofocusing options--or lack thereof; autofocusing still requires either a mirror flip-up or a slow hunt summoned by a button press--both of which will have to be edited out of your final product. But manual focus still works fine, and pro focus-puller add-ons for the 5D Mark II are compatible.

All of these video enhancements (and an impressive eight fps burst shooting mode for up to 126 JPEGs at a time) are made possible by having two of Canon's Digic IV image processors on board--just like your dual-core laptop, doubling the processors means more computing power for crunching all this data.

The EOS 7D will be available in late September for $1,700 (body only) or as a kit with an EF 28-135mm IS lens for $1,900. Just the 5D body still runs $2,700; even with a lens, the 7D is $800 cheaper and schools it on just about everything but the sensor.

Again, we only spent about 30 minutes face to face with a prototype, but even that was enough to realize that the 7D will be a strong contender with both videographers (with its increased framerate support) and photographers (with its enhanced auto-focus, rugged body and overhauled menus and custom functions) at a semi- or fully professional level. The only thing missing (and this will be a dealbreaker for many in the pro-leaning market, I imagine) is the full-frame sensor. Nonetheless, a pretty impressive feat for a single camera, especially at this price.

Want the latest news on grown-up toys and gadgets, product reviews, sneak peeks, and more? Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

3 Comments

This camera is puzzling. They didn't include 1D series weather sealing, opting instead for outdated, ie, the workaround environmental weather sealing. I'll take O-rings over strengthened joints! Now the Pentax K7 for $500 less has 72 O-ring seals which is what Canon puts in the 1D series camera.
They included a semi-pro AF system that we can hope is up to snuff with the AF system Nikon has even though it has over less than half the number the D300 has. The ability to use a smaller amount of area does seem interesting, but is it practical during a shoot?
The premium LP-E6 is a great touch and a much needed upgrade over the BP511a. Now the bonus with Nikon is the ability to go with the ENEL4a which gives you aprox. 2000 shutter releases vs. anything else that may even try to compete.
The video doesn't matter and won't unless you can rid it of the jelly effect. Just sat down and watched a full length movie and a 30 minute movie done with the D90 and the 5dMKII and it was awful to watch. Not practical when the vertical sync on such a large surface just makes everything all trippy... Oh, and don't start me with how awful it is to watch a movie when they can't even keep focus on the subject cause f1.4 seems so cool, but impractical.
Now the one thing that may cause the camera to fail is the 18MP sensor... if we haven't already noticed the pixels only make things look amazing at ISO 100 - 200. After 400 those +14MP cameras just blew in low-light, which is how Nikon became king in all low light tests. I shoot alongside a lot of big cameras and the big reason I end up with accounts is how noise free my sports photos are, not how big it'll print.
Honestly after going over each and every feature it looks exactly like a D300 release list. Even has a knock of D-Lighting, uses color to base it's exposure, pop-up flash lighting control, high fps, digital level, 100% VF... the only thing they improved was better (still not worthy) video, more MP (big negative in my opinion) and the wireless grip option is a must have for pro shooters.
Mind you my comments come from someone who shoots Pentax, Nikon and Canon and does so professionally. Each brand has their plus side and minus side. In my whole hearted opinion this is a stab at copying Nikon spec for spec in the camera department, which Canon is fully capable of creating something far superior. In the video end of the spectrum Canon is king, but it's still not worthy of entertaining as I feel a real camcorder is far superior in keeping whats important in focus without the gurgling on the camera innards and expensive add ons needed to make it useable.
To read more: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/08/28/man-prison-payday-loa...

ErinV:
I'm not sure if you are the one of the notorious pixel peepers that are paper spec racers. Already you are showing some hack comparisons.
1) The 7D doesn't have the 50+ AF pts like the D300. However, it does have all 19 pts featuring a cross type sensor. The D300 has 15 pts with the cross sensor.
The center point is also extra small, so that's a bonus.
It also features a separate AF engine, like some pro bodies.
Whether it's a Canon or Nikon, non cross AF points totally suck in my line of work. I don't even bother with them.
2)Pixel peeping at high ISO is for the birds. All this came from the 50D hate stemming from the crappy dpreview review. Every 50D shooter knows that he or she is not at a disadvantage when comparing to a sensor with less MP. I have seen to many great looking prints from a 50D from 100-1600 ISO. Detailed and pretty. And yes, even if you don't shoot to print the 50D still is just as well behaved as a 40D despite the 5MP increase.
And as a pro, you should know that 14MP+ cameras have a great cropping ability that you can't get with the others. Again as pro, you should know how to work with high ISO shots from any camera. The 50D, 5DII, 1DsIII, A900, D3X are all great at 800+ ISO.
This whole MP vs noise thing is way out of hand, and was never based in reality.

Thanks Canon ... My prayers were answered. The part is purchased as soon as possible!

http://www.hsdpa-vergleich.de



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Grab the Tech Buyer's Guide iPhone App

Carry everything you need to make a smart buy on HDTVs, cameras and 14 other product categories right in your pocket



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


February 2010: Renovating America

Innovative fixes for five of the country's biggest infrastructure messes, plus a look the quest to read the human mind, the LCD screen that might finally kill paper dead, and the world's scariest science.

Read the issue here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!