A new spin on the classic toy is way cool, and still way hard

The Toy Industry Association's annual toy fair had some standout 21st century innovations. Some were creepy, like the Dora the Explorer doll whose hair actually grows when you play an online beauty game. And some were just plain cool. The best thing I got my hands on: A fully electronic version of the classic Rubik's Cube.

See below for details on the technology, plus exclusive video of one of the two existing prototypes.

Hidden in a darkened black tent in a far corner of the fair -- I think by the time I found it I was technically in Jersey -- was the Rubik's TouchCube. Instead of a bunch of interlocking mini-cubes, it's made up of six LED-lighted touch screens. (The dark room gave it a very disco-floor flare.) You simulate twisting the blocks by sliding your finger along a row of squares in the direction you want them to turn. An accelerometer inside determines which side is facing up (i.e., which one you're looking at), and desensitizes the other five so you don't accidentally make a move with the hand you're holding it in.

The folks at Techno Source, who distribute Rubik's products, brought the prototype to PopSci's office for us to play with. The TouchCube is powered by seven chips, one for each side to control the squares' colors, plus one mother chip that keeps the rest in sync, ensuring that if you swipe a row of green-red-yellow row to the right, you get green-red-yellow around the corner. Every square contains three LEDs, one each of red, green, and blue, which light up at different intensities to produce a square's color (the familiar white, orange, yellow, green, red, or blue of the old-school stickers). It comes with a display stand/charging dock for juicing the battery.

The TouchCube is endowed with internal memory, so it remembers every move you make from the start of the game. Center squares double as function buttons, including "undo" to step back your moves in reverse order. Or if you really get stuck, you can press another button to get a hint, or another to watch the puzzle solve itself. Gives you a different sense of satisfaction than getting frustrated and chucking the darn thing across the room. Of course, at this price point -- 150 smackers -- you don't want to be tossing it around.

Want the latest news on grown-up toys and gadgets, product reviews, sneak peeks, and more? Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

8 Comments

Wow this is so cool except for the pice 150 bucks, a bit pricy even the nintendo ds lite is not that pricy and it is way cooler!!!

Toys are getting more and more bland with very few actual innovations floating around. This is probably because of video games but I wont complain about that. Companies are uptight to. They still would rather sell plastic garbage than anything worth playing with. What happened to the good old days when toys were actually quality and manufactured out of metal and could withstand any sandbox? Just build better toys. The toy companies can vamp up the price for all I care. As long as it gives enjoyment they can bump the price for quality. I mean look at video games, you pay $20 and get a lot of bang for you buck and it lasts much longer. Just design a toy that does the same thing and charge $20. Its either that or finally destroying ToysRUS. MUAHAHAHAHA!

I side with unintended. Rubik's cube ( which I worked by following a book), was a revolution in puzzle technology. The interface was simple and elegant. The puzzle itself was
incredibly difficult. (However, you could carry it around with you, and work away at it as long as you had the patience)

The new device seems relatively trivial in terms of tech. I'm sure that the algorithms are cool, but it's a copy of an existing design using a much more flexible technology.
(mechanical vs software).

Also, I don't think that the interface is nearly as intuitive.

I seem to recall the first Rubik's Cube being MORE touch sensitive. And 10 bucks.

Changing the batteries look difficult. In fact, how do you change the batteries? do you have to remove one of the screens?

Looks to me like they just raped an awesome toy.

ameduri

from Westmont, IL

Very unnecessary. There is no point to a touch sensitive Rubik's Cube. Just get the real, original and solve it. That's what I did...

buddyred

from mankato, minnesota

how expensive is it, wouldn't buy it if it breaks right away. they ruined a classic.

Buddyred



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg