The Canon D50 feels very serious. Its magnesium-alloy body seems sturdy enough to hammer nails with. The right-hand grip is meaty, and it practically sticks to your hand, thanks to the supple rubberized grip that wraps from the front to the back of the camera. While I was toting this around on election night, several people stopped to ask me "Who are you with?" They were all surprised when I said that I wasn't a photojournalist, just a guy with a camera.
The 50D's interface took some getting used to but eventually won my heart. Knobs and buttons are basically unchanged since earlier versions. Chief controls are a small jog-wheel at top right, just behind the shutter-release button, a giant scroll wheel on the back for your thumb, and a tiny joystick to the right of the gorgeous three-inch LCD screen.
What's different is the screen. Tap the select button in the center of the scroll wheel, and you get a slickly animated settings screen that you navigate with the joystick to select and adjust virtually every setting, such as ISO, exposure compensation, flash intensity, and light metering mode. At first, this had a point-and-shoot look that made the camera look less serious. But I quickly found it to be very handy. As in the past, you can also make adjustments using a monochrome LCD screen on the top of the camera, but some settings proved to be an ergonomic nightmare. To set ISO, for example, you have to hold down a button about a quarter-inch behind the top jog-wheel and then turn that wheel -- which requires either a carpal-tunnel-inducing contortion of the right hand, or bringing over your left hand and dangerously loosening your grip on the whole camera.
The D90's controls are more old-school. You can hit the "menu" button and scroll though the prettily illustrated options on its own handsome three-inch screen. But you can also make nearly every key adjustment by turning either the scroll wheel on the top front with your right index finger or one on the top-rear with your thumb. Some tweaks require also pushing a button, but never in a way that will cramp your hand. With my analog sensibilities, I prefer the Nikon interface, but this is purely a matter of personal taste.

The D90's body isn't going to impress as many onlookers, however. The sturdy black plastic case screams "consumer model," and the handgrips, though textured, are almost slippery. No one mistook me for an AP photographer. On the upside, though, the D90 is a bit lighter (with a body weighing 22 ounces to the Canon's 26 ounces) and it's about a half-inch narrower than the 50D.
Since both of these SLRs ultimately are consumer cameras, it's not so bad that the D90 looks the part. But it is fun to play grown-up with the 50D.
There is that one special detail about the D90: the ability to shoot video (which just earned it a Best of What's New designation). Both cameras have a live view mode, in which they raise the mirror, open the shutter, and provide a live video preview on the LCD. But only the D90 can record that video (for up to about four minutes). The 720p high-def footage is reasonably sharp, and Nikon's excellent light metering helps the camera quickly adjust as you move it around, so you don't end up with too many dark or overbright frames as the lighting changes.
Having to focus manually is annoying, especially because it's awkward to do when you are using an SLR as a video camera (which is already less than ergonomic). But even the autofocus on real video cameras is a bit sluggish. If you practice enough with the D90, you may get no more -- and perhaps even fewer -- blurred frames than you would with a "real" camcorder. My take: The D90 is a still camera, but it lets you add a few videos to complement your photos, as I did during my shoot at the Spiegeltent.
In case it wasn't already clear, my overall preference is for the Nikon D90. The Canon D50 is no slouch, and it performs better in some conditions, such as low light. And I've gotten some great photos with it. But the Nikon ultimately makes it easier to take good pictures, and does so at a lower price. For an underpaid photo hack like me, that's a winning combination.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
It would have made far more sense to compare the 50D and the D300, since they are closer in both price and specs.
The 50D and the D90 are in two different categories. The D90 is basically a glorified budget model, with some admittedly nice features tossed in. For example, the 720p video recording, though it has some pretty major flaws, is at least on paper, a great bonus (although some would call it more of a gimmick than anything).
But while the D90 would likely be a lot of fun to use for most budding amateurs, it just doesn't offer the build quality or the image quality of the 50D. And anyone hoping to take serious video with it will be frustrated to no end. The 50D, of course, opts to pass on the video aspect and just stick to what DSLRs do best--and there's no doubt it's better at that than the D90. As for the apparent user-friendliness of the D90, much of this ease-of-use paradoxically comes from less flexibility, and options that are tucked neatly away to avoid confusing novice DSLR users.
My advice to anyone who is actually considering between these two cameras for their next purchase: before making a purchase, you may need to do some soul searching and decide precisely what your priorities and your needs are, and then determine whether you want to take the next step in DSLR photography. If you would prefer to remain more casual in the pursuit of your hobby, I can think of no better option than the D90. But if you're itching to step up, I would suggest the 50D is more up your alley. (However, note that from the reviews I've read, the Nikon D300 appears to be a slightly superior camera even to the 50D, so I would definitely recommend some hands-on time with both before making a final decision.) Hope this helps.
What a great comparison! It's hard to argue with actual printed results. While I've used and prefer Nikons since the S model for stills, I use and prefer Canons for video. I hardly believe that 720P is "more of a gimmick" - check out the author's indoor videos from his link. You should see what outdoor video is like!
Actually, the Rebel XSi (450D) comes closer in price and features (also a plastic body camera); same 12 MP (the Nikon is 4288 x 2848, the canon is 4272 x 2848), 3 inch diag LCD screen on both, competitive on lenses and accessories (including "smart" flash units); etc. - but the Nikon (with movie mode) is roughly $200 more street price right now.
The first comment ends with the suggestion that you spend some hands on time with the cameras and I would like to emphasize this as the most important - having good numbers doesn't mean a whole lot when you are uncomfortable with the camera for your usage (be it portraits, outdoors, macro / close ups, etc.
This is also where you look for tricks like wireless remote, and other accessories for your specific use. With computers I always stress your type of use dictates software dictates hardware; the same holds true for these cameras - your use dictates the camera you want.