Tech Trend
A brave new world of li-ion landscaping

Li-ion Landscaping Claire Benoist

While battery-powered yard tools are quiet, efficient and hassle free, they rarely pack the same power as their gas-consuming counterparts. But new electric yard tools with bigger batteries have muscle that rivals their gaseous brethren.

THE TREND

Battery-powered backyard tools have typically topped out at 18 volts—plenty for light work but not nearly enough for cutting fat branches, trimming dense grass, or blowing piles of wet leaves. Manufacturers are now introducing 36-volt lithium-ion-powered tools that can handle those more-demanding tasks, often as well as gas-powered ones can.

THE BENEFIT

Without a combustion engine to deal with, users will never have to clean up gasoline spills or winterize the fuel system. They’ll also never fuss with ripcords and finicky engines, since electric tools turn on instantly. Battery-powered tools are much quieter, too. Because they don’t idle, they make noise only when in use, which can make for happier neighbors.

Leaf blower: Most blowers draw air through vents in their sides and force it to turn 90 degrees before blowing it out, an inefficient route that wastes power. Instead, the Stihl blower pulls air from a rear vent and channels it straight out of the nozzle, saving energy. On its highest speed, users get 385 cubic feet of air per minute, comparable to gas-powered blowers. Stihl BGA 85 $500

Chain saw: Even months after charging, Oregon’s lithium-ion-powered chain saw will start instantly. It can cut a three-inch-diameter branch into 250 slices on one charge. And if it senses too much stress, it shuts itself off, preventing wear on the motor. Oregon PowerNow CS250E $500

Lawn trimmer: Black & Decker’s latest edger is 28 percent lighter than a gas model. Users can run it with less power for touch-ups or more for overgrown weeds and can cut a mile of lawn edges on a single charge. Black & Decker Cordless String Trimmer/Edger LST136 $170

7 Comments

A 500 dollar chain saw with a battery that costs 475 to replace.

I can't see why an overpriced chain saw that you have to pay for again next year wouldn't be a big hit.

So I looked into that chainsaw a little and found this:

1) Its $500 while a very good gas powered saw typically runs about $200-$300 and comes with a 16 inch bar instead of a 14 inch bar.
2) Replacement batteries start at $200 (online) so if you need a second one or the first one just craps out, you are going to pay dearly.
3) The battery takes 2 hours to charge so you'll want a 2nd one.
4) Lithium batteries are easily damaged and chainsaws are usually abused instead of babied.
5) According to the manual and reviews, you can't really use it in wet environments (ie emergency situation in a storm)
6) I have known many people who have stored gas versions in basements and other enclosed areas with no problems. Mine is in my basement right now. I drained the gas and left it outside with the cap off to air out.

Now this may be great for light yard work, and I'am all about quiet and ease of use, but battery powered yard tools really can't compete with a gas versions. I have a Husky chainsaw and as long as it has gas, it will run circles around the battery saw and doesn't take 2 hours to refill the tank. I also used it on wood so stuff and nasty that almost burned up the Husky, so it would eat the battery saw for lunch. Also, if its a tree that's been in muddy water, the wood absorbs minerals and dirt that makes it even harder to cut. Even still, for light use, $500 is a ton of money. My father has a cheap $100 pole saw with a detachable electric chainsaw with a 10 inch bar. Its not cordless, but its a scrapper and will cut up pretty much anything you throw at it. Again, for only $100 it also comes with a 10 foot pole for high up pruning. Better value in my eyes. One final thing, when it comes to a chainsaw, that gas engine firing up tells everyone you mean business. Its hard to be bad ass when it only makes a buzzzzzzzzzz sound.

Science always asks "can we," but doesn't seem to ask "should we."

While too much for most home owners these products have a very real place in the professional market. Not every customer wants to pay people who run loud stinky gas products. These are quite quiet. I tend to like the corded models for home use but a small rancher would be able to use products like this. They tend to be dependable and you don't have to fool with a bad gas, can't start. Half the time I get worn out just trying to start gas stuff or pull the cord out.

I hope this stuff ends up giving us better cars and other products. Maybe 20 years ago I paid a lot for the then new good quality battery powered drills. They have come a long way in that time. The new cordless are expensive for sure but on a job site they save time. And time still is money.

If fuel cell technology progesses to where it would cost effective with good voltage output, then I think gas powered tools days may truly be numbered.

Science always asks "can we," but doesn't seem to ask "should we."

Should we? As long as there are disadvantages to one medium, there's plenty of reason to. Because it sounds cool is not really up there in priorities. Just smash a soda can to the bottom of your bike tire. There you go. Sounds cool. Combustion engine is inefficient. Battery tech is going to improve. If you need serious work right here and now, go for it, get a gas-model appliance. If you dont, it's going to be better to put your money to a tech that has potential and invest in it. Doesn't make sense to throw my money at an old tech that isnt improving or only improves slightly when I dont really need that kind of power around my small yard.

Battery technology will advance as quickly as the petroleum companies allow it to advance!

What an excellent post. I have been thinking along the same lines but have could never channel my thoughts that well or grasp the concepts properly. Your post absolutely states what I always intended to say.

Popular Tags

Regular Features


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


March 2012: The Future of Medicine

A 10,000-rpm, no-pulse heart is completely revolutionizing how we think about transplants. Plus: rapid-response virus hunters, a shocking cure for migraines, the world's youngest person to have achieved nuclear fusion (in his parents' garage!), and much more.


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif