After last year's flood of largely indistinguishable Android tablets, it's natural to glance at Amazon's wildly different Kindle Fire and think "iPad killer." But although the seven-inch tablet's $200 price tag will do plenty to draw attention (and sales), the Fire, at its core, is little more than a video-ready e-reader. Even if it won't lay waste to the iPad, it could have an equally profound influence: The Fire sets a new ultrafast standard for how future mobile—and perhaps desktop—devices surf the Web.
Today's typical mobile browser is a tease. Tap a link, and the first elements of the page zip into view. But then the progress bar crawls as the handset's processor struggles to load the remaining page elements—videos, images, even text—over limited cellular or Wi-Fi connections. Things get backed up in a load queue. On the iPhone 4S, for instance, it takes six seconds to load the 160 elements that make up the Pop Sci homepage. And even as faster 4G networks expand, richer Web languages such as HTML5 will make pages ever more bulky and slow.
The Fire's browser, Amazon Silk, approaches the problem in a novel way. Silk shifts most of the processing duties to Amazon's cloud servers (a.k.a. Amazon Web Services, or AWS). Those servers provide many times the processing power of the Fire itself, so they can pull information from the ethersphere and store, or cache, the data from several sources at once. They also optimize full-resolution elements, like photos and video, for a smaller screen; a three-megabyte image becomes 50 kilobytes, a 1080p video becomes 480, and so on. AWS processes all the elements of the page, and the server then preassembles it for the Fire and sends it to the device as a single stream. Popsci.com should load in no more than a few milliseconds.
At this point, there's little to stop Amazon or potential copycats from making fast server-based browsing the new standard. But until they do, the mere fact that Silk exists makes us hopeful that the days of impatiently waiting on the Web will soon end.
The Silk browser was advertised as being very fast, but it is apparently a nexus of complaints by Kindle Fire adopters so far. How much have you been using it so far?
Not entirely sure if I can agree with the numbers behind some of the remarks here- Opera mini reckons it had nearly 26.5mil users (www.opera.com/press/releases/2009/07/27/) a while back - whereas the best figures put a few million Kindle sales so far- www.pcworld.com/article/246308/actual_kindle_sales_figures_more_than_3_million_sold_so_far.html
- and Opera has far more free potential market growth in terms of installed compatible device base.
Agreed though- server side performance speed perks make sense- but have security/privacy concerns- so I suspect that mobile device CPU performance improvements and cost cutting will speed up web browsing faster than deployment of server side tweaks and caches.
wolpin wolpin wolpin... tut tut tut
i draw readers' attention to the previous dvice article by stewart, written 16th december
paid much for changing your mind were you? or are you just naturally fickle and indecisive? twit