In many Asian countries, the cultural preference for boys is resulting in lopsided sex ratios. To those who assume there’s no prenatal sex discrimination in the United States, think again. The first published analysis of its kind, which appears in the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reveals that some—but not most—Asian families in America are choosing to have a son after one or more daughters.
The natural sex ratio is 1.05 boys for every girl born. This ratio held up for the first (U.S.-born) child of residents who indicated they are Chinese, Korean, or Asian Indian on the 2000 Census. But if their first child was a girl, the sex ratio of the second child was 1.17:1. If the first two children were girls, that ratio jumped to 1.51:1. (Compare to the most recent data for India: 1.39:1 and China: 2.25:1.)
Interestingly, the imbalance seems to be a growing trend here. The researchers found that sex ratios among Asians the 1990 U.S. Census were much more equivalent. I asked the study authors, Lena Edlund and Douglas Almond of Columbia University, why. Their e-mail response:
We don't know. Part may be compositional given substantial immigration during the 1990s (i.e. populations are different). This also provides more statistical power to detect effect in the 2000 Census (the sample is larger).
Also, prenatal ultrasound was not usually done in the 1980s, but became the norm during the 1990s. And between 1989 and 1999, ultrasound use among the Asian groups considered rose faster than it did for whites (as indicated by NCHS natality micro-data).
Moreover, the availability and quality of prenatal sex determination may have improved. The imaging may be better and there are clinics actively advertising their services. (One website we've seen claims to be able to do it reliably already at the 12th week.)
The researchers conceded that it’s hard to predict where this trend will go in the future. Their new data may be implemented by health care practitioners to help curb the practice. And subsequent generations of the sampled families in the 2000 Census will likely show less proclivity for boys as assimilation dampens cultural preferences.
The trend is not, however, swaying the overall ratio of men to women in the United States—the population of Indians, Chinese, and Koreans is simply too small (< 2 percent) to be a significant factor.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
In order to get a male to female ratio of 1.5 to 1 for the 3rd child, are you implying that these parents are aborting the girls until they get a boy?!!! If so, this makes me very very sad.
In order to get a male to female ratio of 1.5 to 1 for the 3rd child, are you implying that these parents are aborting the girls until they get a boy?!!! If so, this makes me very very sad.
Yes...though apprently they are too timid to come out and say that, that is exactly what they are implying. While actual pre-embyonic sex selection techniques exist, they are currently illegal in north america, so the the only way involves finding the sex before the window for abortion closes through an embryonic fluid analysis test or ultra sound and then deciding wether to terminate the child based on those results...hence the corresondng increase in ultrasounds among asian families.
maybe in some areas of the US, not I can guarnatee that abortion for just asian males does not happen in the majority of the US, as an asian speaking some people left there country so they could live freely and give there children equal oppourtunity, so why would it make sense to kill off your daughter if your daughter had an equal setting with boys? It doesn't.
I understand that it's a cultural thing, which won't go away after only a generation or two of exposure to American culture and values. Parents want boys specifically to carry on the family name (it is still not culturally acceptable in most parts of Asia for a girl to keep her name after marriage, or even to hyphenate with her husband's name). This tradition is not exclusive to Asian countries, of course, but China's zero-population-growth policies have turned the pressure on families to produce sons up to a ridiculous level. A simple enough cause, but the effects will ripple in strange ways. The most obvious is: how can the boys be expected to pass on the family name when there simply aren't any girls to marry?
The questions go on with very little effort: How far will the family go to obtain a "suitable" bride? How will the boys learn to treat women if they have no experience? How long can China maintain the zero-population-growth policy?