
For starters, the machine will set you back $10,000 to purchase. You'll then need to buy between 350 and 490 pounds of feedstock to make your first batch. E-Fuel, the company marketing the device, is also planning to offer a program to buy discounted sugar feedstock at a cost of 15 to 30 cents a pound. It takes 10 to 14 pounds to produce a gallon of ethanol. Assuming your first batch costs the low end of 15 cents per pound and you need 10 pounds per gallon, you've already spent $1.50 on raw materials. Add in the cost of 4 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol, the cost of the electricity, and the factor likely to be the real cost of the operation: the production and delivery of the sugar feedstock.
The company aims to keep the cost of ethanol less than $1 per gallon through its feedstock program, but I have a difficult time understanding how that's possible. Even with its recommendation that the end product be dilluted to 65%, the cost still does not approach the $1 mark.
Via SciAm


Wow,
Companies (ie. greedy people) will do anything to make money off of "global warming". Look at how rich Al Gore is because of Global Warming.
Given how inefficient ethanol is in its use as a fuel, it is quite fitting that the Efuel equipment looks like an out house. Because both are full of ...
Nuclear power to produce Hydrogen and other bio alternatives such as bio-diesel make a lot more sense and don't take more energy to make than is obtained.
Hi,
I'm sorry but I get really angry about this sort of thing. Look at the figures above. $10000 to buy it, and then you have to put 500lbs of FOOD into it. Where do they think that's coming from - out of the sky? And to top it all, you have to run it on ELECTRICITY - which has to be generated somewhere! It's just a gimmick.
We need to be using LESS FUEL, not just trying to get it from different sources.
For an alternative solution (which you can implement cheaply and easily now) look at these articles:
How Does a Water Powered Car Work?
Run Your Car On Water
Gary.