People around the world guzzle about 50 billion gallons of bottled water a year, and then toss billions of those plastic bottles into the trash heap instead of the recycling bin. Matt Naples and Peter Zummo think they can take this lemon of a fact and turn it into lemonade—or rather, take those discarded water bottles and turn them into chairs, shelves, or houses for the world’s poor.
The two industrial-design students recently unveiled a plan for water bottles that snap together like Legos. You drink up as usual, but instead of tossing your empty containers, you can use them as building blocks for furniture or shelter. The bottles stack to create almost any form imaginable, since they connect in two different ways: Click the top of one into the bottom of another for a straight line, or get a plus-sign shape by turning them crosswise and interlocking their notched middles.
Lego-like though they are, the bottles can create structures far sturdier than a toy—and do so essentially for free. Filled with dirt, sand, or another widely available material, the bottles become heavy enough to act like regular bricks. Build a house from them, and the sand or other filler would serve as an insulator to keep rooms warm or cool. Meanwhile, the plastic would make the house waterproof and thus more permanent than the plain mud huts often found in the poor countries.
Naples and Zummo drew their inspiration from a U.N. description of the world’s major problems. One of these problems—the lack of clean water in many developing countries—is commonly addressed by trucking in bottled water. So Naples and Zummo decided to take that solution and turn it into a solution for affordable housing, too. It could even end up helping impoverished people earn money. “In the U.S., for most people, their house is their major asset,” says Phil Weilerstein, the executive director of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, which helped fund the project. In developing countries, people can’t sell or borrow money against an easily destroyed mud hut, but a house built from durable, rain-proof bottles could prove more valuable.
The pair, undergrads at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, introduced their idea at last month’s March Madness for the Mind, an expo run by the NCIIA. They’ve produced several bottles so far on rapid-prototyping machines, and have done computer simulations to show the variety of structures that the bottles could support. Next up: Trying to get funding to mold their bottles on the same machines that real manufacturers use. “One of the benefits of the design is that it fits in today’s standard processing,” says Naples. Manufacturers wouldn’t need to change equipment, shipping methods, or vending machines. “Anywhere you see a bottle today, it’ll still fit into size and shape constraints.”
Will two college kids be able to talk companies like Coca-Cola or Evian into revamping their bottles? “They’re in a challenging space, but they’re addressing a really urgent need,” says Weilerstein. And maybe the world is thirsty to give the needy new homes.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Carry everything you need to make a smart buy on HDTVs, cameras and 14 other product categories right in your pocket
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
Innovative fixes for five of the country's biggest infrastructure messes, plus a look the quest to read the human mind, the LCD screen that might finally kill paper dead, and the world's scariest science.
Read the issue here.
One major issue I can see with this idea is what would happen in the event of a fire.
I have lived in Africa for many years and I know a major source for cooking in rural areas would be an open fire. Mud huts and brick houses are flame retardant, but plastic bottles are not and tend to burn with poisonous gases being released.
Plastic also degrade quite rapidly with solar radiation as secondary intermolecular bonds break (the secondary hydrogen bonds, more specifically). These are the bonds holding the joined PET (polyethyleneterephthalate, which is the most commonly used plastic for bottles) molecule strains intact. Once they degrade (can happen within a year), they will become hard and brittle and will not be able to sustain a heavy weight as would be expected in a house.
I think that what these students have tried to do is very respectable, but these issues should also be considered for the safety of the possible inhabitants.
A possible solution to both problems, fire and degradation of the plastic, could be to apply a mud skim coat, much like a plaster coat over lathes to finish a wall. The mud layer would protect the interior from open fire and the outer walls from the ravages of the sun.
Yeah, that's a very good idea. It would then also provide more insulation from heat/cold, create a sturdier wall and privacy from the outside.
It could definitely be a cheap, usable option in that case.
It looks like from the pictures that it is intended to be more of a framework to be coated. If you look closely you can tell that the bottles do not in fact create a solid wall.
Also are there any pictures of just the bottle? I’m curious to see...
I took a design class where we learned about Heineken's vision for the same thing...in glass.
http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/11/heineken-wobo-the-brick-that-holds-b...
Any comments on which material is more durable/ less toxic?
It seems to me that it's not a far cry for someone to fill these bottles with concrete rather than sand. Then the plastic degrading becomes a moot point.
Concrete is going to be cost prohibitive for some, but not all, and being able to build quality in units may make the investment seem more worth while than would building a tiny lump of concrete here and a tiny lump there with the goal of eventually having a wall. With bottles, you just switch out from sand when you can afford to, but you always have a wall.