Dirty Biodeisel

A clean fuel plays no less dirty when it comes to business practices
Biodiesel: Photo by rrelam

We’re still in the honeymoon period with new fuel technologies like biodiesel. They’re clean. Renewable. No more oil-covered seabirds in the news! I can drink out of the tailpipe of my hydrogen fuelcell car! We’ve been so taken with their promise that we’ve neglected to think much about their inevitable downside: these fuels are manufactured, and unfettered manufacturing can be dirty.

Last month, the BBC reported that the rush to produce biofuel in the US has contributed to the doubling of the price of wheat in the last year. Farmers are taking increasingly more land out of wheat production and converting it to corn for biofuel. When the price of wheat goes up, people starve.

Today, the New York Times is reporting on the polluting of rivers by biodiesel plants in the South. While the contaminants themselves are technically nontoxic, the problem is with the quantity and frequency they are being dumped. 135,000 gallons of grease is going to choke a river, no matter if it’s biodegradable.

The burgeoning biofuel industry appears to have uncovered the same short-term solution as so many other companies racing to keep up with demand: it is often cheaper to pay the fines later than to get the permits now. The irony here really goes without saying.

4 Comments

Comments

etfloor
Article Rating:
1
2
3
4
5

I do not believe the government should be involved in subsidizing ethanol and many other things. The current way we are making ethanol just does not work and would not be happening without the government making it possible for private business to make money doing it. I have been following ethanol for a few years and thought it was a good idea until it was revealed that the cost to the consumer, even with subsidies, costs more than gasoline. With the pump price at about the same price per gallon as gasoline, it still costs more because the miles per gallon drop by 1/4 to 1/3. There have been some promise of adjusting engines to do better, but probably only if straight gasoline were eliminated. I am unwilling to pay the extra for ethanol at the current prices. There are also numerous sources that report that as much energy is used to make it as is obtained from it. These reports show anywhere from -10% to +30% energy derived from making ethanol. Now, we have increased our own food costs from burning some of our own food sources. And, we are only producing a very small part of what is needed. The ethanol process also uses a huge amount of water and increases water pollution from the large amount of fertilizer required to grow corn. So, we are not reducing our oil consumption and we are not lower costs. A source revealed it would take every acer of land in the US to produce enough ethanol to replace our oil use and would leave no space to grow our food! Now, I am not completely opposed to ethanol, just making it from our food supply. There have been promising alternative sources to make it, anywhere from corn stalks and swithchgrass to algae. Maybe the federal dollars would be much better spent on researching other forms to produce ethanol?

2 out of 2 people found this comment helpful
jhcheeto
Article Rating:
1
2
3
4
5

I just read in Pop Mechanics new mag about GM teaming with a high tech firm who has a bacteria that eats carbon and makes ethanol for about a $1 a gallon. With their process you can use anything tires, trees and corn.

1 out of 1 people found this comment helpful
2008
Article Rating:
1
2
3
4
5

Well you can if you have some scam going on. Subsidy whatever.

1 out of 1 people found this comment helpful
Leonitus_And_Hi...

from Princeton, ME

Article Rating:
1
2
3
4
5

The government should stop wasting money on bullshit like ethanol and look into promising alternative fuels like biodiesel made from algae.

0 out of 0 people found this comment helpful

PROMOTION

POPSCI'S 21ST ANNUAL BEST OF WHAT'S NEW


Every year, PopSci honors the top 100 innovations in categories such as consumer products, medical tech and engineering.

Learn more and submit your product or technology today at popsci.com/enter.

Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!

PPX: The PopSci Predictions Exchange

RSS Link

The Environment

  • Northwest Passage Commercial Use

    Will the Northwest Passage be used for commercial shipping purposes by September 30, 2008?

  • Arctic Ocean Oil Rush

    This proposition will pay out at POP$100 per share if oil from a rig in the Lomonosov Ridge, the Beaufort Sea or the Chuckchi Sea is produced and packaged for export by January 1, 2010.

Ready to bet on the future? Start here!

Subscribe for 2 free issues!

may2008_cover.jpg