FEMA is urged to move residents after reports that their trailers have dangerously high levels of formaldehyde—but the news is nothing new

FEMA Trailers Josh Miller

As the third Spring since hurricane Katrina approaches, officials at the Centers for Disease Control today urged FEMA to move the 114,000 people who still live in "temporary" travel trailers as quickly as possible. The problem? Dangerously high levels of formaldehyde—a known carcinogen and respiratory irritant—which will only increase as the heat takes its toll on unstable building materials.

Between late December and January, the CDC tested the air inside a random sampling of some 500 trailers across Mississippi and Louisiana. Most homes have formaldehyde levels of about 15 parts per billion; the trailers averaged 77 ppb, some reaching as high as 590. These drastic findings, however, are not exactly news. In 2006, the Sierra Club, and subsequently FEMA itself noted the elevated levels. Since then, two summers have passed—two cycles of materials not intended to house humans in any long-term manner being exposed to heat, leeching out a toxic chemical.

Here is what FEMA Administrator David Paulison said in today's press conference: "Hindsight is 20-20. We can look back and say, 'Yeah, maybe we should have did something differently.'" Hindsight may be 20-20, but considering how long this has been a known issue, it's increasingly apparent that, for whatever reason, FEMA is just playing blind.

Want to learn more about the environment, solar energy, sustainability, and more? Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

2 Comments

I wonder about those living in the same model trailers for decades in places like Las Vegas and such that do it not because of a disaster.
I guess those folks dont count?

So why didnt they locate the source of the readings and remove that? Like the foam rubber seat cushions and such?
Or could it be the location and not even the trailers? Like radon hot spots?

Wow, something should seriously be done about this. I mean, if they were just transfered to some where new, or had newer trailers the levels might not be as high. In the long run the residents of the household's health might be more in need of care than the trailers.


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif