# In Making NCAA Picks, a Statistical Model Proves Most Accurate

Georgia Tech statisticians use Markov chains for a combined 83 percent accuracy over the past nine tournaments. Who is the computer favorite this year?

NCAA Tournament Bracket LRMC we are not, as you can see

In poker, it is well known that playing the odds will net you more wins than losses, but it won’t make you a top player. For that, you need an unquantifiable ability to read the other players at the table and decipher their emotional state when they make bets. Just the opposite is proving to be true when it comes to betting on winners in the NCAA tournament. Engineering professors at the Georgia Institute of Technology have demonstrated that statistics accurately inform success in the tournament. Most people’s picks are based largely on emotional inference, they say, which leads to inaccurate choices.

Their work has come about through a computer ranking system they devised called the Logistic Regression Markov Chain or LRMC (if you’re looking to geek out on Markov chains, see our previous article on airline boarding, which also uses the Markov chain to make its predictions). By analyzing factors such as scoreboard data, home court advantage, and margin of victory, the system’s algorithm has achieved an 83 percent rate of accuracy over the past nine NCAA tournaments.

Another key to its predictive abilities is that it gives a low statistical weight to close games. The researchers determined that in a very close game, the better team wins just over half the time, rending the contest effectively as a coin-flip.

With all four number one seeds making it to the Final Four for the first time ever this year, LRMC analysis is proving particularly prescient. Stay tuned to the tournament's final two rounds this weekend to see if LRMC is right in its endgame: it’s chosen Kansas to win it all.

[Via Physorg]

if that thing worked then it would know that the Tar Heels take hone the title!!!!!

if that thing worked then it would know that the Tar Heels take home the title!!!!!

Wait a minute, a statistical analysis machine puts the overall top seed in the tourney behind the overall number 4 seed? And the Psycho T factor should have put them winning in double digits. Rameses says GO HEELS!!!

amroger2 and dizzie, looks like you spoke a little too soon. The LRMC may be correct after all in predicting Kansas winning it all. The Psycho T factor did lead to a double digit victory...for the Jayhawks!!!!

ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK GO KU!!!!!

Ok, I'll look at the model's results a little more closely next time... And the next time, the Heels WILL take the title!!!

### June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email