One of the more delightful YouTube video genres involves sending a camera
into towards the blackness of space beneath a weather balloon. The first one I ever saw featured a father and his young son in Brookyln. Other have used it for everything from college admission letters to Hello Kitty to Natty Light, to even a LEGO version Felix Baumgartner's jump. Okay, that last one didn't actually make it to space, but it fits the genre: slow launch, frantic first person footage as it plummets, and then a triumphant recovery. Most of these drops rely on a tough camera casing that can survive the fall back to Earth.
David Windestål of Sweden had a different idea. What if, instead of just sending a camera into space, he sent a drone? Well, technically an RC model plane. Here's how he did it:
Start with a model airplane
Windestål picked the FunJet, an RC plane with enough interior space to hold the gadgets he wanted to add.
Add a video transmitter
The video transmitter allows for first-person-view remote control flying. Essentially, it gives the controller a view from the camera mounted inside the cockpit, allowing Windestål to fly the plane as though he were on board. Windestål chose the Lawmate 1W 1.2GHz, a transmitter with an overheating problem that actually becomes an asset in the cold upper atmosphere
Cut the balloon
The most inventive part of Windestål's design is the mechanism that releases the plane from the hydrogen balloon that carries it to space. While it didn't work perfectly in flight, the device is still a good solution to a tricky problem. When the balloon that is carrying the plane gets high enough, it will inevitably burst as the gas inside expands beyond the ability of the balloon to contain it. When that happens, the tangle of balloon risks getting in the way of the radio antenna and covering the camera. Not fantastic. To try to cut the plane loose from the balloon before that happened, Windestål tied a wire around the string holding the balloon, and then at the flick of a switch ran more electricity through the wire than it was rated for, causing it to burn through the rope over the course of 10-30 seconds.
Enjoy the fall
After the modified FunJet disconnected from the balloon, it began plummeting toward Earth. Windestål got control of the plane after 20 minutes and was able to fly it back to the ground, steering it past a road before gracelessly striking a tree. Watch the video below:
Windestål put together a detailed DIY guide describing how he constructed his space plane. One word of caution: Helium is very expensive in Sweden, so Windestål instead used highly flammable hydrogen to inflate his balloon. If hydrogen in balloons sounds familiar, that's probably because of the Hindenburg,, an airship which caught fire and exploded in 1937. Windestål recommends against using hydrogen, and I can't agree more.
That was great. He should have flown it to the house.
You can't get to space in a balloon.
The closest thing to an official boundary to space is the Karman Line (100 km). This is the point where any aircraft would have to be traveling at orbital speed to maintain altitude through aerodynamic lift.
NASA has a somewhat lower standard giving astronaut wings at 80 km. But even using NASA's standard, 30 km isn't even half way to space.
I know it sound really cool to say that you sent your ________ into space. But the fact is that if you used a balloon to get it up there, you were no where near space. Not even close.
PopSci why didn't you fact check this story? That plane went to 30 km, which is 70 km below the boundary to space.
The picture at the top of the article was taken through a fisheye lens.
No worries, if PoPSCi says and shows we can flap our wings, we can fly! Its true!
Oh and yes, this balloon bumps the bottom of the ISS too.
Does it seem to anyone else that this meme only ends badly when someone's stratospheric HelloKitty or college admit tube gets sucked into a jet engine or copter rotor on its way up or down from YouTube glory?
Nit picking aside, sounds like a wonderful learning experience that i hope was shared with as many young minds as possible.
Especially before we are regulated to our houses and not allowed to raise our eyes to the sky.
It's hard enough to move onward and upwards, but easy enough to pull backwards and downwards.
In the US, there are FAA regulations regarding balloons like these. I looked into doing it as part of an engineering senior design project. Assuming they are followed (which is legally a good idea) they shouldn't pose much of a risk to aircraft.
Kind of funny, because my advisor suggested this same concept of a balloon with a payload that would return to it's launch point. I opted to do one with my internship (ie: free) but I'm glad someone eventually did something similar. Off the shelf electronics are much better than they were a few years ago. Kudos to this guy.
No Kudos until he sticks the landing. I'm kidding, that was a pretty cool Father/Son garage project.