Invention Awards 2012
A new helicopter engine design that's both safe and simple

The NorEaster Webb Chappell

When James O’Neill, a retired marketing executive, first learned how helicopter powertrains worked a decade ago, he immediately started redesigning them. Most helicopters have a huge transmission that reduces the engine’s high speed to a level more fit for the main propeller and turns the tail rotor to keep the aircraft from corkscrewing out of control. Engineers had found a way to get rid of the tail rotor years ago: Place a coaxial propeller on the main propeller, and spin it in the opposite direction. But doing so still required a complicated assembly to achieve the proper speed and to create spin in opposite directions. O’Neill realized that a cam engine, which trades a crankshaft for a series of lobed cams, could power both propellers at the right speed without the need for a weighty, maintenance-heavy gearbox. If he could just design a cam system that produced counter-rotational force, he’d have a new kind of helicopter that was simpler and lighter.

In O’Neill’s NorEaster engine, eight opposing pistons drive a pair of four-lobed cams. (The system could also work with four pistons.) A piston stroke cycle creates a quarter of a cam rotation. Piston engines run efficiently at 2,000 rpm; the four-lobed cams reduce the piston speed to 500 rpm at the rotor, ideal for smaller (up to 2,000 pounds) and unmanned helicopters. Between the two cams is a bevel-gear assembly whose sole function is to make the cams, and the rotors they drive, turn in opposite directions.

The current NorEaster prototype has a power-to-weight ratio comparable to most conventional helicopter power systems, even though O’Neill made it in a local machine shop from generator and weed-whacker parts. But it’s not yet light enough. To make the NorEaster a salable alternative, O’Neill will build a version made from lighter-weight, custom-machined parts with the goal of generating one horsepower per pound.

Cutting weight without losing power is a challenge, but O’Neill isn’t going it alone. A group of students at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts recently analyzed and redesigned the NorEaster system for their senior project. O’Neill is now overseeing a team of volunteer machinists, engineers and friends to build the next prototype. They could test it in a helicopter as soon as next year. “These are basic pistons and cylinder heads and cams that have been used for 100-odd years,” O’Neill says. “It’s not rocket science.”

Inventor: James O'Neill
Invention: NorEaster
Cost to Develop: $10,000
Distance to Market: short ● ● ● ● long

HOW IT WORKS

The NorEaster proof-of-concept prototype eliminates the crankshaft in favor of two rotating cams. A bevel-gear assembly makes them rotate counter to each other, providing equal rotational force in opposite directions. The next prototype will have four-lobed cams that work with four or eight pistons.

Inventors

The Other 2012 Invention Awards Winners Are...

Want to read more articles like this, plus tips and tricks, home hacks, DIY projects, and more? Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

7 Comments

This article is a nice break from all the "Food Tech" articles! What is going on with that? Not that I don't love seeing how fast we can makes robots debone lamb and carve chickens!
- wise up

Speaking as a Robot, I am on your side, aware_one. I found this topic more interesting too.

I don't see a working engine, just the concept of one. I thought the better helicopters were powered by turbine engines, not piston engines. We need to see a working engine that produces power, not a gearing system driven by an electric motor.

david_forbus, please have a little optimism and respect for Mr. O'Neill and the inventive process. This guy is designing and building a novel technology. Nobody who values time and/or money does that without developing a proof-of-concept prototype first.

Unless this has already been done; if he put a hollow tube shaft over the main shaft that spun a smaller rotor in the opposite direction at a higher rate you could theoretically even the torque loads without the use of a tail rotor. Kind of similar to a balance shaft in some 4 cylinder engines. In theory the smaller rotor could also act as a compressor to increase the airspeed which would create more thrust.

I wish I could build a prototype of my invention. I just don't have the money for it. It can viewed at:
www.ultimate-propulsion.com or on my website:

www.hosseinnabipour.ca

If it doesnt work turn it into a car motor.

Popular Tags

Regular Features



July 2013: The Future Of Flight

The incredible innovations, like drone swarms and perpetual flight, bringing aviation into the world of tomorrow. Plus: today's greatest sci-fi writers predict the future, the science behind the summer's biggest blockbusters, a Doctor Who-themed DIY 'bot, the organs you can do without, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif