When John Carnett—Popular Science staff photographer, inventor and tinkerer-about-town—began confiding in people about plans for his latest project, he found few allies. Not surprisingly, almost no one wanted any part of his scheme to stuff a jet-turbine engine in a Polaris RZR all-terrain vehicle. But Carnett, who grew up near an airfield, remained undeterred.
His early attempts to procure a jet by calling manufacturers proved futile. When he told them of his idea to put the engine in a land-based vehicle, they inevitably hung up. He did find a few turbines for sale on eBay but decided that probably wasn’t the safest bet. Finally he turned to the gray market of turbine hobbyists, ultimately deciding that a gas turbine was most appropriate and secured a Garrett GTP 30-67 model, along with some other parts, for $6,000. The 87-pound engine, made back in the 1960s, was used in a power generator for the military.
In all, it took 10 months, more than $15,000 and countless headaches to bring “Project Whirl” to life. And getting the other parts together was a feat in itself. Fortunately, Polaris donated the RZR out of curiosity to see what would become of it in Carnett’s workshop. He got parts such as the roll cage, suspension, wheels, tires and lights gratis too. He also had to spend hours on the phone with anyone he thought could help propel his invention to the next step. “I would go through 20 or 30 days at a time of total failure,” Carnett says, like the time he used the wrong hydraulic fluid, causing the starter motor to blow up. Eventually someone instructed him to use automatic-transmission fluid instead because it’s much thinner and better suited to a jet engine.
Six weeks after an initial test run that took him all of 20 feet from his driveway, Carnett fixed the design and found himself driving five miles around his Philadelphia hometown, half expecting to get arrested. Next he took the Whirl out to the woods to let it roam in its natural habitat. The beast gets seven miles to the gallon on a mixture of three gallons of regular gas to one gallon of diesel, and it roars at a rock-concert noise level of about 114 decibels. Topping out at just over 60 mph, it isn’t much faster than a stock RZR, but the Whirl’s gas turbine reaches maximum power in seconds and stays at that level all the time, so it can get up to its top speed almost instantly even from a dead stop. And the vehicle does some other things a stock model doesn’t: require the driver to don ear protection, have a fire extinguisher at the ready, and wear a flame-resistant Nomex suit.

Time: 10 Months
Cost: $15,000+


We previously posted on Carnett's Jet Quad when it was completed last summer
.138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
This month, a look at the future of secret warfare, the dangerous search for Afghanistan's mineral wealth, a backyard flamethrower, and the most amazing college labs.
Read the issue here.

Editor: John Mahoney | Email
Associate Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Cool toy, but with todays environmental issues does it make Cents. I don't see the benifit, this ranks right up there with the V8 powered snow-blower, what a waste of energy.
What was the fuel econmy of the Quad before the mod.
What benifit is this to us in terms of usable tech.
This should have been a artical in a hot rod mag, or listed as, "dumb toys for they well off redneck."
Didn't this guy put a turbine engine in an import buggy a couple years ago?
I'm always disappointed to see turbines mated to reduction gears - the appeal of a turbine is that it is relatively simple and efficient. why not find a hydraulic pump (impeller?) that can handle the turbine's native RPM? or go hybrid with a straightforward generator -> rectifier setup? the latter especially for exotic applications, where putting an individually-controllable motor in each wheel would have huge advantages...
This is pretty awesome. Wish I had the time to try something like that.
@mcstuff The great thing about building stuff is it does not have to make sense it is just fun to try and I think most of the time the fun is in getting something to fit/work then the finished project.
I do agree that I hate to see turbines hooked to reduction gears but I wonder how much a pump that could handle that kind of speed would cost and how accessible it would be.
@markhahn Most hydraulic pumps at that high an rpm would have serious cavitation problems. Many wire wound armatures at that rpm would fly apart. Always compromises...
@mcstuff - are you serious?
@wowlfie - Agreed. It would perhaps be a more useful exercise to do an exotic EV conversion, maybe throw in a small generator to make it range extended. It would also cost much less than throwing in a gas turbine. I wish guys like this would put their talent to good use developing viable solutions to the challenges we face today. We would make remarkable progress... :-)
Fantastic- I love it!
When are you going to start your next project using a 1400hp T-58 gas turbine?
TurbineDood
My turbine powered boat:
www.TurbineFun.com
from Tornt, ON
@ TurbineDood
Where did you get your Turbine? How much?
Awesome boat!