It's almost Earth Day!
IPO: EARTH2
"Will NASA's Kepler mission find another Earth-like planet by the end of the year?"
On April 17th, NASA received the initial photos from its first satellite dedicated solely to finding Earth-like planets. Over the next three and a half years, the Kepler satellite telescope will photograph over 100,000 stars, capturing the image of any planets that pass between their star and the telescope. Using that method of searching, the chance of finding a planet the size of Earth, at the same distance from its star, around a star like ours, is around 1 in 215. At that rate, if Kepler does photograph all 100,000 planets, it should find around 465 Earth-like worlds. With any luck, one of those new Earths will already have Clancy Brown, Antonio Sabato Jr. and a 23-year-old Rebecca Gayheart on it.
This prop will pay out POP$100 if NASA announces that the Kepler space telescope has discovered another Earth-like planet before January 1st, 2010. This prop can be checked at http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/main/index.html.
Related Links:
http://discovery.nasa.gov/kepler.html
http://www.rdmag.com/ShowPR.aspx?PUBCODE=014&ACCT=1400000101&ISSUE=0904&RELTYPE=PR&PRODCODE=00000000&PRODLETT=YO
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=government&articleId=9131683&taxonomyId=13&intsrc=kc_top

140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
The 6th annual Invention Awards are here, from an inflatable tourniquet to a better lobster trap to spring-loaded hocket skates. This issue is all about the celebration of invention.
Plus: Making synthetic biology breakthroughs in a garage, building a constantly-moving ping-pong table, and a ridiculously overpowered barbecue.
bump
Once again, this prop raises the issue of "what is Earth-like?" Are we defining it as a "rock" rather than a gaseous plane? Is the presence of an atomosphere required? Does the mass have to be the same as Earth, or would something ten times bigger count? Does it have to be in what they call a "habitable" orbit?
All these things need to be considered, because what passes for "Earth-like" depends on who's talking when. There were news briefs last year that called a planet "Earth-like" that was 9 times the size of earth, had no atomosphere, and followed an orbit that took it waaaay to close to the star.
But that's the way many astronomer's define it. They say if the planet is stoney (rather than gaseous), then it's "Earth-like". This ought to be included in the prop.
Vulgarian is right. If you could list some properties that you'd like the planet to have, that would be much better for prop gambling.
I see that the prop does include some information; "Using that method of searching, the chance of finding a planet the size of Earth, at the same distance from its star, around a star like ours...", but if it isn't in the payout line it will certainly lead to a lot of questions. Including the determining factor(s) in the payout seems like what would be needed.
i don't think we need to focus on what is or is not an Earth-like planet. All that needs to happen is that NASA announces they found an Earth-like planet with the Kepler space telescope. Even if a billion people say what NASA found is not an Earth-like planet, as long as NASA announces they found one, it should pay long.
from golden, Colorado
From what I heard, they are simply taking picture of the silloughets of these earthlike planets contrasting against local stars. They cant tell if they have atmospheres or very many details. Its pretty mutch like looking at a flee in the middle of your cars headlights.