Well people, its the new year and we have a problem, most of us older players have more money than we can spend in the market. with all the wealth generated at new years many of us will have hundreds of thousands of popsci$ that will just sit idle.
perhaps this would be a good time to double the 1000 share limit ?
tell me what you all think.
happy new year
JJackhinx

140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
The 6th annual Invention Awards are here, from an inflatable tourniquet to a better lobster trap to spring-loaded hocket skates. This issue is all about the celebration of invention.
Plus: Making synthetic biology breakthroughs in a garage, building a constantly-moving ping-pong table, and a ridiculously overpowered barbecue.
bump^^^
With some of the new developments that should be coming soon, such as leagues (maybe Taylor and others can clarify this thought), I think there will be other ways to keep all our moolah from sitting idle. I don't support upping the share limit; instead we should look at diversification.
Thank you for your time and consideration. :)
from Exeter, CA
its a good idea but, scojac is right