This week, Digg announced that the first version of the new Digg Reader will begin rolling out next week, with all users having access to it by June 26th. This sounds like a small event--a startup releasing an RSS reader. But it's actually an update to one of the most fundamental ongoing battles of the internet and journalism as a whole: how and where do we read things online?
You wouldn't know it from the outrage at the news of Google Reader's shutdown, but RSS readers have been quietly falling out of vogue (check out this post from back in 2009 saying RSS readers are "in disarray" and "continue to decline," and this graph showing use declining in the last few years).
Like them or not, RSS readers are a very 2008 way to read articles. Twitter has supplanted RSS for many people; I've personally gone from watching hundreds of RSS feeds to watching hundreds of Twitter feeds, and I'm not the only one. Twitter can function like an RSS reader with a bonus social element. An RSS feed is carefully curated and streamlined, but Twitter doesn't work like that--though you can try to make your Twitter stream tight and only follow certain accounts, those accounts can retweet other accounts, or respond, or converse with each other. It's unpredictable, but it gives you a much wider range of sources. You never know what you're going to get, which is philosophically very different from RSS.
And then there's the social element. RSS is a lonely, mechanical tool, fetching what you asked for but nothing else. Twitter gives you way more than you asked for. Sometimes that's to its detriment, of course, but not always. On Twitter, you can see what's popular, what's controversial, how a story takes shape and then mutates. RSS can't do that by definition.
But Digg's new Reader is a blend of the classic RSS input/output and its own algorithmic recommendation skills. It'll be "a super plain and simple but speedy reading experience," says Digg's Andrew McLaughlin, but with one additional tool: "a way to sort your unread items by how popular they are on the internet." The idea is three-pronged: you can sort by global popularity; you can plug in your Facebook and Twitter and sort by popularity within your social group; or you can get personalized rankings, what Digg thinks you'll like based on what you've retweeted or faved or Dugg or shared in other ways. It's a chimera of the two forms.
Digg also tells me that Digg Reader is not a response to the shutdown of Google Reader; McLaughlin says they'd been planning an RSS reader since "late last year." But the deadline of July 1st, the date when Google Reader shuts down, is certainly a reaction, and the increased attention on what would normally be a relatively small product launch is as well.
"The burden is on us to prove that the kind of reader we want to build is better than the alternatives" like Twitter, says McLaughlin.
If what you want is the ability to skim large #s of headlines, organize lots of feeds, label them, tag articles for later reading in one fast unobtrusive "no magazine layout" reader, SwarmIQ is your choice.
Sign up, click on the Google reader icon to get all your feeds, and get up and running straight away.
Disclosure: I'm on the team that built this site :-) Also, we don't have "Google Alerts" type functionality yet.
RSS is better than fb and/or twitter in a way that every update in a website is captured while fb news update is not updated instantly (I think, it depends on the site and its admin of course).