When Roy Buol stepped into the mayor's office of the city of Dubuque in 2005, he did so with a handful of imperatives. There were the needs of his citizens, who throughout his campaign had voiced concerns on issues like public transit, green space, water quality, and recycling. There was the need to live up to his campaign message, which centered on engaging citizens as partners in the administration of the city. And then there were his private concerns about the larger world.
"I've always been concerned about the energy and resource use in this country," Buol says "It's almost like people think we have an infinite supply of energy and resources, and we don't. There are better ways of doing things, but as citizens of the world we don't have the real-time information so we can make better decisions when we're using energy and resources."
By 2006 Buol already had the city council on board to make sustainability a top priority for the city. But it was in 2009 that Dubuque--population 60,000, ninth-largest city in the nation's 30th most populous state--began its transformation into one of the most important cities in America. That's when the city launched a unique public/private partnership with IBM Research to recreate Dubuque as the nation's first truly smart, sustainable city. For both Buol and IBM, that meant data--real-time data, and lots of it.
The partnership involves a series of pilot studies aimed at engaging and empowering citizens through information. The city has already completed a pilot program that replaced the water meters in 300 households with smart water meters that interface with IBM's technology. One thousand more households have been fitted with smart electricity meters for a smarter electricity pilot that is currently underway. A 250-home smart natural gas metering program is also tabulating resource usage, feeding residents and the city real-time data about natural gas consumption. Then there's the Smarter Travel initiative, in which 1,000 households have volunteered to let IBM and the city follow citizens movements via smartphone and RFID technology so city managers can determine how to make the flow of people throughout the city more efficient and less energy intensive.
These testbed technologies aren't just about delivering information to city hall and IBM data servers, but delivering data directly to Dubuque's citizens. Aside from the anonymized aggregated data IBM delivers to the city, the system gathers and delivers personalized data in real time to the households involved in the pilots via secure web portals. The overarching idea is that if you give citizens tools to find the inefficiencies in their lives, they'll tighten the screws themselves.
"The plan is pretty simple: Give people what they need," says David Lyons, project manager for Sustainable Dubuque, the larger umbrella initiative that includes the IBM Research partnership. "And they've defined that for us. They need information that is specific to their utilization of resources. Not just about how the community or the world uses resources, but 'how do I use resources?'"
Thus far, it's working. The results of Dubuque's sustainability experiment are still quite preliminary--only the water pilot has actually competed a full trial--but already the initiative has produced tangible benefits, Lyons says. For one, Dubuque is learning how how to engage its citizens with data--"just because someone has access to the Internet in their home doesn't mean they are comfortable inter-relating with data over the Web," he says--but it's also learning how to engage a city government with data.
"There are personal decision-making tools, but there are also policy-making tools," Lyons says. "The data in aggregate comes to the city, and now the city can begin using it to do due diligence on investment and policy decisions: how long will it take for new water technology to pay for itself through new revenue or savings? What is the opportunity to avoid investment in something like a parking ramp through the use of increased transit opportunities?"
The smart water metering pilot is already producing hard results: an overall 6.6 percent reduction in the utilization of water that was at least partially driven by an eight-fold increase in the number of households that each--by looking at data--identified and fixed a leak.
In Dubuque, less water waste means less energy waste as well. Water production is the most energy-intensive activity the city engages in, Buol says, and it's like that for pretty much every city. On top of that, more than a quarter of all clean water is lost as waste. If data can help individual citizens identify and fix leaks, then everyone benefits from reduced energy consumption. These kinds of relationships don't live at the surface. But, Buol says, they do live in the data.
"It gives me very strong reason for hope," Buol says. "I think this creates a very compelling model for other cities to replicate. It won't be the City of Dubuque or IBM trying to sell what we're doing: People will be able to see it and they'll want the same benefits for their citizens and their businesses."
Therein lies the whole idea of this collaboration. Dubuque isn't special because it's unique, Dubuque is special because it's every city in America. There's not a single piece of this technology that couldn't be implemented in any other city in the country, Lyons says. Soon, Dubuque and IBM plan to scale their smart technologies--and the efficiencies they bring--city-wide (the water project is already exploding from just 300 households to 3,000 households and 1,000 small businesses). After it spreads across Dubuque, it could spread anywhere.
IBM has even developed a plug-and-play version of its analytics software called the Intelligent Operations Center that offers real-time analytics tools to cash-strapped municipalities that can't yet afford to make investments in all of the hardware that will someday tie together the cities of the future.
Next year Dubuque will have the hard data from its electricity, transit, and natural gas pilots and it will further scale the projects to take in larger numbers of households and businesses. And if the project continues on its current trajectory, it will be difficult for other cities to ignore what's going on there.
Which means Dubuque, Iowa, may soon be coming to a city near you.
News reporter: "And in other news, America's only smallest town are getting as intelligent as some of China's largest cities. Will all of the U.S. use this as a guide to build education up across the board, we'll tell you later after these messages."
" Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein
Making the population of Dubuque GIGOmaniacs. The fountain of useless information is an abyss.
Did you RTFA? People have already saved money, and improved things by fixing leaks they would have never noticed. That's just one way that this program is helping our city. GIGO would mean that there's garbage going in. It's not; it's useful data that can be used to make things more efficient and save money. It also changes how they read meters, which will save money as well. Unless you think that saving money is useless. If so, send me some of yours, I could find something to do with it, I'm sure.
Well this idea has been in stone for awhile Kibblet, you should check out the speech Justin Hall did on TED talks, his approach is clearing CO2, free electricity, no power grid and bringing water to everyone on earth. Its nearly a 100 year old idea that dates back to Tesla. However this approach does not involve a Massive 80 story Tesla coil, nope, it just involves carbon-nano tubes. I see a hurdle with all these oil and gas lobbyist that may pop up to kill this idea. But I see it as an inevitability, its either we stay stuck to our normality and die or we adapt and survive. Goto TEDtalks website and look under technology, then look for CEO justin Hall.
I would send the link the site but popsci loves to be a catch u next Tuesday about it.
" Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein
Cost Versus Savings?
How much do these programs cost?
How much do they think they will cost when they go large scale?
Technology does not live in an economic vacuum.....
Is this just another government boondoggle?
I live in Dubuque. I have a "smart" water meter...EVERYONE does. When I called the public works dept. to decline the installation of this intrusive technology they said if I did not have it installed they would shut off my water. Nice.
This is all being done under the United Nations' Agenda 21 and ICLEI (Google both) to combat non-existent man-made climate change. It takes electricity to pump and treat water. The more water used the more electricity needed to pump and treat it. Thus, the more coal must be burned.
The city is selling this technology as a way for citizens to save money (finding leaks and being aware of how much water one uses)
My question is, once IBM has enough data collected, when do I get a letter from the public works dept. telling me, "Mr. Luecke, data shows that the average four person household takes seven minute showers. We show your family takes on average 13 minutes showers. Either you bring your shower time in line with other households or we turn off your water (or charge you more)."
The electricity study (soon to go city wide) asked participants to go online to a portal and enter their home's square footage and ALL electrical devices; large and small. "Volunteers" can then check their electrical usage and try to find ways to limit it.
Again, once this goes city-wide and IBM has collected enough data on my electricity usage, how much of a stretch is it to believe we are mandated to use this portal and limit our electricity usage?
Same with gas down the road.
Now the entire county is planning to jump on this "sustainability" bandwagon. Rural property owners will be limited as to what they may do with their private property. If the planned use does not fall within the government's "sustainable" guidelines, the property owner will not be able to do what he wants with his own privately owned property.
Conspiracy? Nope. Get the facts.
It is an inevitability that water/energy usage will be mandated. Sure, 13 minute showers may be nice, and by law you have the freedom to do so, however, what most forget, is our freedom to consume is limited to the quantity of what is being consumed. As time goes on, and populations grow, and resources such as water is consumed and wasted, it will become more scarce (because we use more of it than the Earth can replenish), and as it becomes more scarce, you'll be lucky if you even have running water available to take any shower at all. These mandates, however draconian and oppressive as they may appear, they will appear inevitably, unless we somehow learn to recycle and reuse the vast majority of what we consume (which at it's current rate isn't happening fast enough).
I understand what you're saying and your feelings on this subject, but the fact of the matter is the technologies being developed are for the greater good in the long run. Plus, why don't you want to help? It's not like they are video taping your shower, they are just seeing how much water you use.
The water company has the right to say "Do this or you don't get our water" on the terms that it's THEIR water, when you get it into your house you pay for it, not the other way around. If you don't like it, well that sucks, but just like the law says you CAN take 13 minute showers, the law also says the company doesn't have to supply it.
To be honest I'd love to be a praticipant in this kind of experiment. Working for a better future is my kinda thing, even if I don't ever get to experience that kind of future myself.