Even the most attentive driver can become distracted, especially in city traffic. Now Volvo has your back with City Safety, a feature on the XC60 crossover SUV that can prevent or mitigate accidents and injuries at around-town speeds. We tested the technology in a dare-you-to-crash demo, steering the XC60 toward a bright-colored inflatable car at 10 mph and resisting the powerful urge to hit the brakes. The system worked like a charm, quickly stopping the 4,200-pound Volvo and avoiding a crunch with a few feet to spare.

City Safety calculates the distance and closing speed to the car ahead by beaming a laser mounted near the rearview mirror. A sensor detects reflections from a car’s tail lamps, license plate or body metal. Get too close, too fast, and the system applies up to 50 percent of the vehicle’s stopping power. It’s designed to come on late and hard—to be unpleasant enough that drivers won’t get lazy and let it handle everyday braking. The system shuts down at speeds below roughly 2 mph to avoid needless stops when you’re crawling in close traffic. At approach speeds between 10 and 19 mph, the system won’t always prevent that fender-bender, but sharply slowing the vehicle will reduce the damage.

Get It: Volvo XC60
Starts at $37,200
volvocars.com
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
I'm sure that the engineering is excellent, but it's another complex system that tries to solve one aspect of driving.
My issues with all of these systems:
1. They add complexity
2. They take over vehicle control to some extent -- sometimes at unexpected times.
3. There's no standard defining how well they should function
4. They can be fooled -- and there's no good way to know how that might occur
5. Despite all the disclaimers, they give drivers a false sense of security
I propose that gradual efforts be made to provide automated control. Start in the nastiest spots and begin requiring vehicles going through those spots to be automated -- via a defined system. Alternately -- start banning most vehicles from certain areas and require mass transit.
I think that these random piecemeal solutions ultimately do more harm than good.