The newest pocket cams use stabilization to save you from your shaky hands
Posted 06.29.2006 at 1:00 am
1 Comment
The smaller your camera, the more susceptible it is to even the slightest tremble, which can leave your photos looking like Impressionist paintings. Fortunately, optical image stabilization has trickled down from pro cams to the shake-prone pocket models. The cameras use motion sensors to detect any quiver and move a piece of the lens to compensate for it. I tested three in the most blur-inducing scenarios: in low light without a flash-the slow shutter speed gives you more time to twitch-and at full zoom, which magnifies shake.
To see how they fared, launch the photo gallery by clicking the "Slideshow" button above.
Related:
Picture-Perfect Navigation: What's New in GPS
Cellphones With Seoul: The Hottest New Phones From Korea
The Goods: July 2006
1 Comment
To comment, please Login.
138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Innovation Challenges
Popular Science+ For iPad
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Download Our App
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Follow Us On Twitter
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
.jpg)
February 2012: The Future of Fun
Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?
Popular on Popsci
Most Viewed
slow shutter speed
Most Emailed
slow shutter speed
Most Commented
slow shutter speed
Today on PopSci.com
Copyright © 2009 Popular Science
A Bonnier Corporation Company. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
It would be nice if image stabilization didn't suck up battery life so much. Other people also might be interested in a guess as to how much you would be paying for the image stabilization in small cameras.